From 03b86a1452842fa3dbba615e64465e738982743f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: glebius <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 05:44:25 +0000
Subject: There are actually two different cases when mlock(2) returns ENOMEM.
 Clarify this, taking text from SUS.

Reviewed by:	kib
---
 lib/libc/sys/mlock.2 | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'lib/libc/sys/mlock.2')

diff --git a/lib/libc/sys/mlock.2 b/lib/libc/sys/mlock.2
index 0e5fef8..42acc97 100644
--- a/lib/libc/sys/mlock.2
+++ b/lib/libc/sys/mlock.2
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 .\"	@(#)mlock.2	8.2 (Berkeley) 12/11/93
 .\" $FreeBSD$
 .\"
-.Dd December 25, 2012
+.Dd March 18, 2013
 .Dt MLOCK 2
 .Os
 .Sh NAME
@@ -138,7 +138,12 @@ is set to 0 and the caller is not the super-user.
 .It Bq Er EINVAL
 The address given is not page aligned or the length is negative.
 .It Bq Er ENOMEM
-Some portion of the indicated address range is not allocated.
+Some or all of the address range specified by the addr and len
+arguments does not correspond to valid mapped pages in the address space
+of the process.
+.It Bq Er ENOMEM
+Locking the pages mapped by the specified range would exceed a limit on
+the amount of memory that the process may lock.
 .El
 .Sh "SEE ALSO"
 .Xr fork 2 ,
-- 
cgit v1.1