From 53992adde3eda3ccf9da63bc7e45673f043de18f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rdivacky Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:17:06 +0000 Subject: Update clang to r104832. --- lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp') diff --git a/lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp b/lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp index 45518e9..d6594cd 100644 --- a/lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp +++ b/lib/AST/NestedNameSpecifier.cpp @@ -145,14 +145,14 @@ NestedNameSpecifier::print(llvm::raw_ostream &OS, InnerPolicy.SuppressScope = true; // Nested-name-specifiers are intended to contain minimally-qualified - // types. An actual QualifiedNameType will not occur, since we'll store + // types. An actual ElaboratedType will not occur, since we'll store // just the type that is referred to in the nested-name-specifier (e.g., // a TypedefType, TagType, etc.). However, when we are dealing with // dependent template-id types (e.g., Outer::template Inner), // the type requires its own nested-name-specifier for uniqueness, so we // suppress that nested-name-specifier during printing. - assert(!isa(T) && - "Qualified name type in nested-name-specifier"); + assert(!isa(T) && + "Elaborated type in nested-name-specifier"); if (const TemplateSpecializationType *SpecType = dyn_cast(T)) { // Print the template name without its corresponding -- cgit v1.1