From 6045cae71a438a752980a395f03717a13cc22179 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: peter Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 01:01:56 +0000 Subject: Import cvs-1.11.15 --- contrib/cvs/src/classify.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'contrib/cvs/src/classify.c') diff --git a/contrib/cvs/src/classify.c b/contrib/cvs/src/classify.c index 285153c..7ce8235 100644 --- a/contrib/cvs/src/classify.c +++ b/contrib/cvs/src/classify.c @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ Classify_File (finfo, tag, date, options, force_tag_match, aflag, versp, * There is no user file, so note that it was lost and * extract a new version */ - /* Comparing the command_name against "update", in + /* Comparing the cvs_cmd_name against "update", in addition to being an ugly way to operate, means that this message does not get printed by the server. That might be considered just a straight @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ Classify_File (finfo, tag, date, options, force_tag_match, aflag, versp, gets hit when a patch fails and the client fetches a file. I'm not sure there is currently any way for the server to distinguish those two cases. */ - if (strcmp (command_name, "update") == 0) + if (strcmp (cvs_cmd_name, "update") == 0) if (!really_quiet) error (0, 0, "warning: %s was lost", finfo->fullname); ret = T_CHECKOUT; @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ Classify_File (finfo, tag, date, options, force_tag_match, aflag, versp, /* See comment at other "update" compare, for more thoughts on this comparison. */ - if (strcmp (command_name, "update") == 0) + if (strcmp (cvs_cmd_name, "update") == 0) if (!really_quiet) error (0, 0, "warning: %s was lost", finfo->fullname); ret = T_CHECKOUT; -- cgit v1.1