From 17e05ba7e22711bea49b3d84e522c1355d55900c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ache <ache@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 17:55:11 +0000
Subject: Bypass itimerfix 100000000 limit in nanosleep1 using loop through
 timeouts

---
 sys/kern/kern_time.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys/kern/kern_time.c b/sys/kern/kern_time.c
index 2caef60..e938b5e 100644
--- a/sys/kern/kern_time.c
+++ b/sys/kern/kern_time.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
  * SUCH DAMAGE.
  *
  *	@(#)kern_time.c	8.1 (Berkeley) 6/10/93
- * $Id: kern_time.c,v 1.29 1997/06/24 18:20:50 jhay Exp $
+ * $Id: kern_time.c,v 1.30 1997/08/03 07:26:50 bde Exp $
  */
 
 #include <sys/param.h>
@@ -210,59 +210,77 @@ nanosleep1(p, rqt, rmt)
 	struct proc *p;
 	struct timespec *rqt, *rmt;
 {
-	struct timeval atv, utv;
-	int error, s, timo;
+	struct timeval atv, utv, rtv;
+	int error, s, timo, i, n;
 
-	if (rqt->tv_nsec < 0 || rqt->tv_nsec >= 1000000000)
+	if (rqt->tv_sec < 0 || rqt->tv_nsec < 0 || rqt->tv_nsec >= 1000000000)
 		return (EINVAL);
 	TIMESPEC_TO_TIMEVAL(&atv, rqt)
-	if (itimerfix(&atv))
-		return (EINVAL);
 
-	/*
-	 * XXX this is not as careful as settimeofday() about minimising
-	 * interrupt latency.  The hzto() interface is inconvenient as usual.
-	 */
-	s = splclock();
-	timevaladd(&atv, &time);
-	timo = hzto(&atv);
-	splx(s);
-
-	p->p_sleepend = &atv;
-	error = tsleep(&nanowait, PWAIT | PCATCH, "nanslp", timo);
-	p->p_sleepend = NULL;
-
-	if (error == ERESTART)
-		error = EINTR;
-	if (error == EWOULDBLOCK)
-		error = 0;
-	if (rmt != NULL) {
-		/*-
-		 * XXX this is unnecessary and possibly wrong if the timeout
-		 * expired.  Then the remaining time should be zero.  If the
-		 * calculation gives a nonzero value, then we have a bug.
-		 * (1) if settimeofday() was called, then the calculation is
-		 *     probably wrong, since `time' has probably become
-		 *     inconsistent with the ending time `atv'.
-		 *     XXX (1) should be fixed now with p->p_sleepend;
-		 * (2) otherwise, our calculation of `timo' was wrong, perhaps
-		 *     due to `tick' being wrong when hzto() was called or
-		 *     changing afterwards (it can be wrong or change due to
-		 *     hzto() not knowing about adjtime(2) or tickadj(8)).
-		 *     Then we should be sleeping again instead instead of
-		 *     returning.  Rounding up in hzto() probably fixes this
-		 *     problem for small timeouts, but the absolute error may
-		 *     be large for large timeouts.
+	if (itimerfix(&atv)) {
+		n = atv.tv_sec / 100000000;
+		rtv = atv;
+		rtv.tv_sec %= 100000000;
+		(void)itimerfix(&rtv);
+	} else
+		n = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0, error = EWOULDBLOCK;
+	     i <= n && error == EWOULDBLOCK;
+	     i++) {
+		if (n > 0) {
+			if (i == n)
+				atv = rtv;
+			else {
+				atv.tv_sec = 100000000;
+				atv.tv_usec = 0;
+			}
+		}
+		/*
+		 * XXX this is not as careful as settimeofday() about minimising
+		 * interrupt latency.  The hzto() interface is inconvenient as usual.
 		 */
 		s = splclock();
-		utv = time;
+		timevaladd(&atv, &time);
+		timo = hzto(&atv);
 		splx(s);
-		timevalsub(&atv, &utv);
-		if (atv.tv_sec < 0)
-			timerclear(&atv);
-		TIMEVAL_TO_TIMESPEC(&atv, rmt);
+
+		p->p_sleepend = &atv;
+		error = tsleep(&nanowait, PWAIT | PCATCH, "nanslp", timo);
+		p->p_sleepend = NULL;
+
+		if (error == ERESTART)
+			error = EINTR;
+		if (rmt != NULL && (i == n || error != EWOULDBLOCK)) {
+			/*-
+			 * XXX this is unnecessary and possibly wrong if the timeout
+			 * expired.  Then the remaining time should be zero.  If the
+			 * calculation gives a nonzero value, then we have a bug.
+			 * (1) if settimeofday() was called, then the calculation is
+			 *     probably wrong, since `time' has probably become
+			 *     inconsistent with the ending time `atv'.
+			 *     XXX (1) should be fixed now with p->p_sleepend;
+			 * (2) otherwise, our calculation of `timo' was wrong, perhaps
+			 *     due to `tick' being wrong when hzto() was called or
+			 *     changing afterwards (it can be wrong or change due to
+			 *     hzto() not knowing about adjtime(2) or tickadj(8)).
+			 *     Then we should be sleeping again instead instead of
+			 *     returning.  Rounding up in hzto() probably fixes this
+			 *     problem for small timeouts, but the absolute error may
+			 *     be large for large timeouts.
+			 */
+			s = splclock();
+			utv = time;
+			splx(s);
+			timevalsub(&atv, &utv);
+			if (atv.tv_sec < 0)
+				timerclear(&atv);
+			if (n > 0)
+				atv.tv_sec += (n - i) * 100000000;
+			TIMEVAL_TO_TIMESPEC(&atv, rmt);
+		}
 	}
-	return (error);
+	return (error == EWOULDBLOCK ? 0 : error);
 }
 
 #ifndef _SYS_SYSPROTO_H_
-- 
cgit v1.1