| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This will make a number of things easier in the future, as well as (finally!)
avoiding the Id-smashing problem which has plagued developers for so long.
Boy, I'm glad we're not using sup anymore. This update would have been
insane otherwise.
|
| |
|
|
| |
an in to a function instead of a "struct timeval".
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
simplest thing is to just calculate the days using curtime - boottime / 86400.
The modification for this is less obtrusive anyway.
Suggested by: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
that if you do an rup on a machine that's been running longer than a year,
you get the wrong day count. Now we factor in 365 * (curtime.tm_year -
boottime.tm_year) to get the correct value. (I noticed this while running
rup on a SunOS machine I have that's been up 525 days. My FreeBSD
machines all said it had only been up for 160 (525-365) days. :)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
man page :-).
|
|
|
Reviewed by: Geoff
Submitted by: John Brezak
|
