| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in r291840
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
|
|
|
|
| |
as double, similar to r178141.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
support, rather than just "", which refers to the system default based
on the environment.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tests. (Buy 10, get one free!) The separate categories were
already there; they just weren't labeled.
- Use fesetround() instead of fpsetround(), since the former is
standard and implemented on all supported architectures. Add
tests for each rounding mode.
- Add additional tests for subnormals.
Some of these tests won't pass until problems in vendor sources
(gdtoa and gcc) are fixed and new versions imported, but I
want to get these changes into the tree before I accidentally
blow them away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
understood by Perl's Test::Harness module and prove(1) commands.
Update README to describe the new protocol. The work's broken down into
two main sets of changes.
First, update the existing test programs (shell scripts and C programs)
to produce output in the ok/not ok format, and to, where possible, also
produce a header describing the number of tests that are expected to be
run.
Second, provide the .t files that actually run the tests. In some cases
these are copies of, or very similar too, scripts that already existed.
I've kept the old scripts around so that it's possible to verify that
behaviour under this new system (in terms of whether or not a test fails)
is identical to the behaviour under the old system.
Add a TODO file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See revision 1.3 of src/share/numericdef/el_GR.ISO8859-7.src
Reviewed by: das (a while ago)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While here, disable some of the long double tests on i386, since
FreeBSD/i386 is the only port that doesn't evaluate long doubles in
their full precision (due to constant folding bugs in gcc).
|
|
|
|
| |
zeroes right.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
of %f formats where the number of significant digits is < expt.
|
| |
|
|
Tests for correct printing of subnormals are lacking.
|