| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
parameter that can specify configuration parameters:
o rev cloner api's to add optional parameter block
o add SIOCCREATE2 that accepts parameter data
o rev vlan support to use new api (maintain old code)
Reviewed by: arch@
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
order to - for example - apply firewall rules to a whole group of
interfaces. This is required for importing pf from OpenBSD 3.9
Obtained from: OpenBSD (with changes)
Discussed on: -net (back in April)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- In ifc_name2unit(), disallow leading zeroes in a unit.
Exploit: ifconfig lo01 create
- In ifc_name2unit(), properly handle overflows. Otherwise,
either of two local panic()'s can occur, either because
no interface with such a name could be found after it was
successfully created, or because the code will bogusly
assume that it's a wildcard (unit < 0 due to overflow).
Exploit: ifconfig lo<overflowed_integer> create
- Previous revision made the following sequence trigger
a KASSERT() failure in queue(3):
Exploit: ifconfig lo0 destroy; ifconfig lo0 destroy
This is because IFC_IFLIST_REMOVE() is always called
before ifc->ifc_destroy() has been run, not accounting
for the fact that the latter can fail and leave the
interface operating (like is the case for "lo0").
So we ended up calling LIST_REMOVE() twice. We cannot
defer IFC_IFLIST_REMOVE() until after a call to
ifc->ifc_destroy() because the ifnet may have been
removed and its memory has been freed, so recover from
this by re-inserting the ifnet in the cloned interfaces
list if ifc->ifc_destroy() indicates a failure.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
softc lists and associated mutex are now unused so these have been removed.
Calling if_clone_detach() will now destroy all the cloned interfaces for the
driver and in most cases is all thats needed to unload.
Idea by: brooks
Reviewed by: brooks
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
cloner. This ensures that ifc->ifc_units is not prematurely freed in
if_clone_detach() before the clones are destroyed, resulting in memory modified
after free. This could be triggered with if_vlan.
Assert that all cloners have been destroyed when freeing the memory.
Change all simple cloners to destroy their clones with ifc_simple_destroy() on
module unload so the reference count is properly updated. This also cleans up
the interface destroy routines and allows future optimisation.
Discussed with: brooks, pjd, -current
Reviewed by: brooks
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
panic at kmem_alloc() via malloc(9).
PR: kern/77748
Submitted by: Wojciech A. Koszek
OK'ed by: brooks
Security: local DoS, a sample code in the PR.
MFC after: 3 days
|
| |
|
|
| |
Found by: src/tools/tools/kernxref
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reported by: rwatson
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
esp. not since the backing memory was just freed.
Reviewed by: rwatson
|
|
|
- Split the code out into if_clone.[ch].
- Locked struct if_clone. [1]
- Add a per-cloner match function rather then simply matching names of
the form <name><unit> and <name>.
- Use the match function to allow creation of <interface>.<tag>
vlan interfaces. The old way is preserved unchanged!
- Also the match function to allow creation of stf(4) interfaces named
stf0, stf, or 6to4. This is the only major user visible change in
that "ifconfig stf" creates the interface stf rather then stf0 and
does not print "stf0" to stdout.
- Allow destroy functions to fail so they can refuse to delete
interfaces. Currently, we forbid the deletion of interfaces which
were created in the init function, particularly lo0, pflog0, and
pfsync0. In the case of lo0 this was a panic implementation so it
does not count as a user visiable change. :-)
- Since most interfaces do not need the new functionality, an family of
wrapper functions, ifc_simple_*(), were created to wrap old style
cloner functions.
- The IF_CLONE_INITIALIZER macro is replaced with a new incompatible
IFC_CLONE_INITIALIZER and ifc_simple consumers use IFC_SIMPLE_DECLARE
instead.
Submitted by: Maurycy Pawlowski-Wieronski <maurycy at fouk.org> [1]
Reviewed by: andre, mlaier
Discussed on: net
|
