| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
osf1_signal.c:1.41, amd64/amd64/trap.c:1.291, linux_socket.c:1.60,
svr4_fcntl.c:1.36, svr4_ioctl.c:1.23, svr4_ipc.c:1.18, svr4_misc.c:1.81,
svr4_signal.c:1.34, svr4_stat.c:1.21, svr4_stream.c:1.55,
svr4_termios.c:1.13, svr4_ttold.c:1.15, svr4_util.h:1.10,
ext2_alloc.c:1.43, i386/i386/trap.c:1.279, vm86.c:1.58,
unaligned.c:1.12, imgact_elf.c:1.164, ffs_alloc.c:1.133:
Now that Giant is acquired in uprintf() and tprintf(), the caller no
longer leads to acquire Giant unless it also holds another mutex that
would generate a lock order reversal when calling into these functions.
Specifically not backed out is the acquisition of Giant in nfs_socket.c
and rpcclnt.c, where local mutexes are held and would otherwise violate
the lock order with Giant.
This aligns this code more with the eventual locking of ttys.
Suggested by: bde
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
as they both interact with the tty code (!MPSAFE) and may sleep if the
tty buffer is full (per comment).
Modify all consumers of uprintf() and tprintf() to hold Giant around
calls into these functions. In most cases, this means adding an
acquisition of Giant immediately around the function. In some cases
(nfs_timer()), it means acquiring Giant higher up in the callout.
With these changes, UFS no longer panics on SMP when either blocks are
exhausted or inodes are exhausted under load due to races in the tty
code when running without Giant.
NB: Some reduction in calls to uprintf() in the svr4 code is probably
desirable.
NB: In the case of nfs_timer(), calling uprintf() while holding a mutex,
or even in a callout at all, is a bad idea, and will generate warnings
and potential upset. This needs to be fixed, but was a problem before
this change.
NB: uprintf()/tprintf() sleeping is generally a bad ideas, as is having
non-MPSAFE tty code.
MFC after: 1 week
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
o change the mapping arrays to have a zero offset rather than base 1;
this eliminates lots of signo adjustments and brings the code
back inline with the original netbsd code
o purge use of SVR4_SIGTBLZ; SVR4_NSIG is the only definition for
how big a mapping array is
o change the mapping loops to explicitly ignore signal 0
o purge some bogus code from bsd_to_svr4_sigset
o adjust svr4_sysentvec to deal with the mapping table change
Enticed into fixing by: Coverity Prevent analysis tool
Glanced at by: marcel, jhb
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
in emulation layers), since it appears to be too broad.
Requested by: rwatson
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
former is callable from user space and the latter from the kernel one. Make
kernel version take additional argument which tells if the respective call
should check for additional restrictions for sending signals to suid/sugid
applications or not.
Make all emulation layers using non-checked version, since signal numbers in
emulation layers can have different meaning that in native mode and such
protection can cause misbehaviour.
As a result remove LIBTHR from the signals allowed to be delivered to a
suid/sugid application.
Requested (sorta) by: rwatson
MFC after: 2 weeks
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Return NULL instead of returning memory outside of the stackgap
in stackgap_alloc() (FreeBSD-SA-00:42.linux)
- Check for stackgap_alloc() returning NULL in svr4_emul_find(),
and clean_pipe().
- Avoid integer overflow on large nfds argument in svr4_sys_poll()
- Reject negative nbytes argument in svr4_sys_getdents()
- Don't copy out past the end of the struct componentname
pathname buffer in svr4_sys_resolvepath()
- Reject out-of-range signal numbers in svr4_sys_sigaction(),
svr4_sys_signal(), and svr4_sys_kill().
- Don't malloc() user-specified lengths in show_ioc() and
show_strbuf(), place arbitrary limits instead.
- Range-check lengths in si_listen(), ti_getinfo(), ti_bind(),
svr4_do_putmsg(), svr4_do_getmsg(), svr4_stream_ti_ioctl().
Some fixes obtain from OpenBSD.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
kern_sigprocmask() in the various binary compatibility emulators.
- Replace calls to sigsuspend(), sigaltstack(), sigaction(), and
sigprocmask() that used the stackgap with calls to the corresponding
kern_sig*() functions instead without using the stackgap.
|
| |
|
|
| |
and improve readability.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a follow on commit to kern_sig.c
- signotify() now operates on a thread since unmasked pending signals are
stored in the thread.
- PS_NEEDSIGCHK moves to TDF_NEEDSIGCHK.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed by: md5
|
| |
|
|
| |
Requested by: rwatson, phk, and many others
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
gets signals operating based on a TailQ, and is good enough to run X11,
GNOME, and do job control. There are some intricate parts which could be
more refined to match the sigset_t versions, but those require further
evaluation of directions in which our signal system can expand and contract
to fit our needs.
After this has been in the tree for a while, I will make in kernel API
changes, most notably to trapsignal(9) and sendsig(9), to use ksiginfo
more robustly, such that we can actually pass information with our
(queued) signals to the userland. That will also result in using a
struct ksiginfo pointer, rather than a signal number, in a lot of
kern_sig.c, to refer to an individual pending signal queue member, but
right now there is no defined behaviour for such.
CODAFS is unfinished in this regard because the logic is unclear in
some places.
Sponsored by: New Gold Technology
Reviewed by: bde, tjr, jake [an older version, logic similar]
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
they aren't in the usual path of execution for syscalls and traps.
The main complication for this is that we have to set flags to control
ast() everywhere that changes the signal mask.
Avoid locking in userret() in most of the remaining cases.
Submitted by: luoqi (first part only, long ago, reorganized by me)
Reminded by: dillon
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note ALL MODULES MUST BE RECOMPILED
make the kernel aware that there are smaller units of scheduling than the
process. (but only allow one thread per process at this time).
This is functionally equivalent to teh previousl -current except
that there is a thread associated with each process.
Sorry john! (your next MFC will be a doosie!)
Reviewed by: peter@freebsd.org, dillon@freebsd.org
X-MFC after: ha ha ha ha
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
other "system" header files.
Also help the deprecation of lockmgr.h by making it a sub-include of
sys/lock.h and removing sys/lockmgr.h form kernel .c files.
Sort sys/*.h includes where possible in affected files.
OK'ed by: bde (with reservations)
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Spotted by: jake
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
process is on the alternate stack or not. For compatibility
with sigstack(2) state is being updated if such is needed.
We now determine whether the process is on the alternate
stack by looking at its stack pointer. This allows a process
to siglongjmp from a signal handler on the alternate stack
to the place of the sigsetjmp on the normal stack. When
maintaining state, this would have invalidated the state
information and causing a subsequent signal to be delivered
on the normal stack instead of the alternate stack.
PR: 22286
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of 4 longs used as a bitmask. sv4r4_sigfillset has been broken for a
while, probably since rev 1.5.
This patch fixes SVR4_NSIG (i.e.: sets it to the actual number of signals,
instead of the number of bits in the mask) because some SysVR4 clients
honestly seem to care about whether bits in the signal mask are set for
non-existant signals.
Additionally, the svr4_sigfillset macro has been replaced by a
fully fledged function, because the macro didn't actually work
(it returned an all-ones mask, but we don't want that: we want 0's
set where FreeBSD doesn't actually have a signal which is the same
as an SysVR4 signal, for example).
SysVR4 clients can now successfully ignore signals, although catching
them remains problematic (see commit log message for rev1.13 of
sys/i386/svr4/svr4_machdep.c for more info).
|
| |
|
|
| |
Prodded by: phk
|
| |
|
|
| |
Submitted by: phk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
can provide the correct context to each signal handler.
Fix broken sigsuspend(): don't use p_oldsigmask as a flag, use SAS_OLDMASK
as we did before the linuxthreads support merge (submitted by bde).
Move ps_sigstk from to p_sigacts to the main proc structure since signal
stack should not be shared among threads.
Move SAS_OLDMASK and SAS_ALTSTACK flags from sigacts::ps_flags to proc::p_flag.
Move PS_NOCLDSTOP and PS_NOCLDWAIT flags from proc::p_flag to procsig::ps_flag.
Reviewed by: marcel, jdp, bde
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
-----------------------------
The compatibility code and/or emulators have been updated:
iBCS2 now mostly uses the older syscalls. SVR4 now properly
handles all signals. This has been achieved by using the
new sigset_t throughout the emulator. The Linuxulator has
been severely updated. Internally the new Linux sigset_t is
made the default. These are then mapped to and from the
new FreeBSD sigset_t.
Also, rt_sigsuspend has been implemented in the Linuxulator.
Implementing this syscall basicly caused all this sigset_t
changing in the first place and the syscall has been used
throughout the change as a means for testing. It basicly is
too much work to undo the implementation so that it can
later be added again.
A special note on the use of sv_sigtbl and sv_sigsize in
struct sysentvec:
Every signal larger than sv_sigsize is not translated and is
passed on to the signal handler unmodified. Signals in the
range 1 upto and including sv_sigsize are translated.
The rationale is that only the system defined signals need to
be translated.
The emulators also have been updated so that the translation
tables are only indexed for valid (system defined) signals.
This change also fixes the translation bug already in the
SVR4 emulator.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
with sa_ when <signal.h> is included. They would conflict with the
upcoming SA_SIGINFO implementation.
Reviewed by: BDE
|
|
|
See http://www.freebsd.org/~newton/freebsd-svr4 for limitations,
capabilities, history and TO-DO list.
|
