| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
is clearer about what we are actually doing.
Requested by: bde
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
testing and real-life applications:
1) If you returned from the thread function, you got a segv instead of
calling _exit() with your return code.
2) clean up some bogus stack management. There was also an underflow
on function return.
3) when making syscalls, the kernel is expecting to have to leave space
for the function's return address. We need to duplicate this. It was
an accident that the rfork syscall actually worked here. :-/
|
|
|
the number of times I have given this to people and got asked: why isn't
it in libc? It is impossible to do this without assembler glue to reset
the stack for the new child process.
int rfork_thread(flags, stack_addr, start_fnc, start_arg)
int flags; Flags to rfork system call. See rfork(2).
void *stack_addr; Top of stack for thread.
int (*start_fnc)(void *); Address of thread function to call in child.
void *start_arg; Argument to pass to the thread function in child.
This is deliberately not documented or prototyped in includes until the
corresponding alpha version is written.
|
