1 files changed, 83 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/openmp_default_simd_align.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/openmp_default_simd_align.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c869a94
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/openmp_default_simd_align.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -verify %s
+
+struct S0 {
+  int x;
+  static const int test0 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(x); // expected-error {{invalid application of '__builtin_omp_required_simd_align' to an expression, only type is allowed}}
+  static const int test1 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(S0::x));
+  auto test2() -> char(&)[__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(x))];
+};
+
+struct S1; // expected-note 6 {{forward declaration}}
+extern S1 s1;
+const int test3 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(s1)); // expected-error {{invalid application of '__builtin_omp_required_simd_align' to an incomplete type 'decltype(s1)' (aka 'S1')}}
+
+struct S2 {
+  S2();
+  S1 &s;
+  int x;
+
+  int test4 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(x)); // ok
+  int test5 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(s)); // expected-error {{invalid application of '__builtin_omp_required_simd_align' to an incomplete type 'S1'}}
+};
+
+const int test6 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(S2::x));
+const int test7 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(S2::s)); // expected-error {{invalid application of '__builtin_omp_required_simd_align' to an incomplete type 'S1'}}
+
+// Arguably, these should fail like the S1 cases do: the alignment of
+// 's2.x' should depend on the alignment of both x-within-S2 and
+// s2-within-S3 and thus require 'S3' to be complete.  If we start
+// doing the appropriate recursive walk to do that, we should make
+// sure that these cases don't explode.
+struct S3 {
+  S2 s2;
+
+  static const int test8 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(s2.x));
+  static const int test9 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(s2.s)); // expected-error {{invalid application of '__builtin_omp_required_simd_align' to an incomplete type 'S1'}}
+  auto test10() -> char(&)[__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(s2.x))];
+  static const int test11 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(S3::s2.x));
+  static const int test12 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(S3::s2.s)); // expected-error {{invalid application of '__builtin_omp_required_simd_align' to an incomplete type 'S1'}}
+  auto test13() -> char(&)[__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(s2.x))];
+};
+
+// Same reasoning as S3.
+struct S4 {
+  union {
+      int x;
+    };
+  static const int test0 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(x));
+  static const int test1 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(S0::x));
+  auto test2() -> char(&)[__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(x))];
+};
+
+// Regression test for asking for the alignment of a field within an invalid
+// record.
+struct S5 {
+  S1 s;  // expected-error {{incomplete type}}
+  int x;
+};
+const int test8 = __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(S5::x));
+
+long long int test14[2];
+
+static_assert(__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(test14)) == 16, "foo");
+
+static_assert(__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(int[2]) == __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(int), ""); // ok
+
+namespace __builtin_omp_required_simd_align_array_expr {
+  alignas(32) extern int n[2];
+  static_assert(__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(n)) == 16, "");
+
+  template<int> struct S {
+      static int a[];
+    };
+  template<int N> int S<N>::a[N];
+  static_assert(__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(S<1>::a)) == __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(int), "");
+  static_assert(__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(S<1128>::a)) == __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(int), "");
+}
+
+template <typename T> void n(T) {
+  alignas(T) int T1;
+  char k[__builtin_omp_required_simd_align(decltype(T1))];
+  static_assert(sizeof(k) == __builtin_omp_required_simd_align(long long), "");
+}
+template void n(long long);