diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp | 103 |
1 files changed, 59 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp index 76d9d43..2b4892b 100644 --- a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp +++ b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ #include "llvm/IntrinsicInst.h" #include "llvm/Metadata.h" #include "llvm/Module.h" -#include "llvm/ModuleProvider.h" #include "llvm/Pass.h" #include "llvm/PassManager.h" #include "llvm/TypeSymbolTable.h" @@ -162,7 +161,8 @@ namespace { VerifierFailureAction action; // What to do if verification fails. Module *Mod; // Module we are verifying right now - DominatorTree *DT; // Dominator Tree, caution can be null! + LLVMContext *Context; // Context within which we are verifying + DominatorTree *DT; // Dominator Tree, caution can be null! std::string Messages; raw_string_ostream MessagesStr; @@ -179,24 +179,25 @@ namespace { Verifier() : FunctionPass(&ID), Broken(false), RealPass(true), action(AbortProcessAction), - DT(0), MessagesStr(Messages) {} + Mod(0), Context(0), DT(0), MessagesStr(Messages) {} explicit Verifier(VerifierFailureAction ctn) : FunctionPass(&ID), - Broken(false), RealPass(true), action(ctn), DT(0), + Broken(false), RealPass(true), action(ctn), Mod(0), Context(0), DT(0), MessagesStr(Messages) {} explicit Verifier(bool AB) : FunctionPass(&ID), Broken(false), RealPass(true), - action( AB ? AbortProcessAction : PrintMessageAction), DT(0), - MessagesStr(Messages) {} + action( AB ? AbortProcessAction : PrintMessageAction), Mod(0), + Context(0), DT(0), MessagesStr(Messages) {} explicit Verifier(DominatorTree &dt) : FunctionPass(&ID), - Broken(false), RealPass(false), action(PrintMessageAction), - DT(&dt), MessagesStr(Messages) {} + Broken(false), RealPass(false), action(PrintMessageAction), Mod(0), + Context(0), DT(&dt), MessagesStr(Messages) {} bool doInitialization(Module &M) { Mod = &M; + Context = &M.getContext(); verifyTypeSymbolTable(M.getTypeSymbolTable()); // If this is a real pass, in a pass manager, we must abort before @@ -212,6 +213,7 @@ namespace { if (RealPass) DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(); Mod = F.getParent(); + if (!Context) Context = &F.getContext(); visit(F); InstsInThisBlock.clear(); @@ -315,6 +317,7 @@ namespace { void visitStoreInst(StoreInst &SI); void visitInstruction(Instruction &I); void visitTerminatorInst(TerminatorInst &I); + void visitBranchInst(BranchInst &BI); void visitReturnInst(ReturnInst &RI); void visitSwitchInst(SwitchInst &SI); void visitSelectInst(SelectInst &SI); @@ -413,10 +416,10 @@ void Verifier::visit(Instruction &I) { void Verifier::visitGlobalValue(GlobalValue &GV) { Assert1(!GV.isDeclaration() || + GV.isMaterializable() || GV.hasExternalLinkage() || GV.hasDLLImportLinkage() || GV.hasExternalWeakLinkage() || - GV.hasGhostLinkage() || (isa<GlobalAlias>(GV) && (GV.hasLocalLinkage() || GV.hasWeakLinkage())), "Global is external, but doesn't have external or dllimport or weak linkage!", @@ -597,6 +600,9 @@ void Verifier::visitFunction(Function &F) { const FunctionType *FT = F.getFunctionType(); unsigned NumArgs = F.arg_size(); + Assert1(Context == &F.getContext(), + "Function context does not match Module context!", &F); + Assert1(!F.hasCommonLinkage(), "Functions may not have common linkage", &F); Assert2(FT->getNumParams() == NumArgs, "# formal arguments must match # of arguments for function type!", @@ -648,9 +654,11 @@ void Verifier::visitFunction(Function &F) { "Function takes metadata but isn't an intrinsic", I, &F); } - if (F.isDeclaration()) { + if (F.isMaterializable()) { + // Function has a body somewhere we can't see. + } else if (F.isDeclaration()) { Assert1(F.hasExternalLinkage() || F.hasDLLImportLinkage() || - F.hasExternalWeakLinkage() || F.hasGhostLinkage(), + F.hasExternalWeakLinkage(), "invalid linkage type for function declaration", &F); } else { // Verify that this function (which has a body) is not named "llvm.*". It @@ -742,6 +750,14 @@ void Verifier::visitTerminatorInst(TerminatorInst &I) { visitInstruction(I); } +void Verifier::visitBranchInst(BranchInst &BI) { + if (BI.isConditional()) { + Assert2(BI.getCondition()->getType()->isIntegerTy(1), + "Branch condition is not 'i1' type!", &BI, BI.getCondition()); + } + visitTerminatorInst(BI); +} + void Verifier::visitReturnInst(ReturnInst &RI) { Function *F = RI.getParent()->getParent(); unsigned N = RI.getNumOperands(); @@ -820,8 +836,8 @@ void Verifier::visitTruncInst(TruncInst &I) { unsigned SrcBitSize = SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits(); unsigned DestBitSize = DestTy->getScalarSizeInBits(); - Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVector(), "Trunc only operates on integer", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVector(), "Trunc only produces integer", &I); + Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "Trunc only operates on integer", &I); + Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "Trunc only produces integer", &I); Assert1(isa<VectorType>(SrcTy) == isa<VectorType>(DestTy), "trunc source and destination must both be a vector or neither", &I); Assert1(SrcBitSize > DestBitSize,"DestTy too big for Trunc", &I); @@ -835,8 +851,8 @@ void Verifier::visitZExtInst(ZExtInst &I) { const Type *DestTy = I.getType(); // Get the size of the types in bits, we'll need this later - Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVector(), "ZExt only operates on integer", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVector(), "ZExt only produces an integer", &I); + Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "ZExt only operates on integer", &I); + Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "ZExt only produces an integer", &I); Assert1(isa<VectorType>(SrcTy) == isa<VectorType>(DestTy), "zext source and destination must both be a vector or neither", &I); unsigned SrcBitSize = SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits(); @@ -856,8 +872,8 @@ void Verifier::visitSExtInst(SExtInst &I) { unsigned SrcBitSize = SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits(); unsigned DestBitSize = DestTy->getScalarSizeInBits(); - Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVector(), "SExt only operates on integer", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVector(), "SExt only produces an integer", &I); + Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "SExt only operates on integer", &I); + Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "SExt only produces an integer", &I); Assert1(isa<VectorType>(SrcTy) == isa<VectorType>(DestTy), "sext source and destination must both be a vector or neither", &I); Assert1(SrcBitSize < DestBitSize,"Type too small for SExt", &I); @@ -873,8 +889,8 @@ void Verifier::visitFPTruncInst(FPTruncInst &I) { unsigned SrcBitSize = SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits(); unsigned DestBitSize = DestTy->getScalarSizeInBits(); - Assert1(SrcTy->isFPOrFPVector(),"FPTrunc only operates on FP", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isFPOrFPVector(),"FPTrunc only produces an FP", &I); + Assert1(SrcTy->isFPOrFPVectorTy(),"FPTrunc only operates on FP", &I); + Assert1(DestTy->isFPOrFPVectorTy(),"FPTrunc only produces an FP", &I); Assert1(isa<VectorType>(SrcTy) == isa<VectorType>(DestTy), "fptrunc source and destination must both be a vector or neither",&I); Assert1(SrcBitSize > DestBitSize,"DestTy too big for FPTrunc", &I); @@ -891,8 +907,8 @@ void Verifier::visitFPExtInst(FPExtInst &I) { unsigned SrcBitSize = SrcTy->getScalarSizeInBits(); unsigned DestBitSize = DestTy->getScalarSizeInBits(); - Assert1(SrcTy->isFPOrFPVector(),"FPExt only operates on FP", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isFPOrFPVector(),"FPExt only produces an FP", &I); + Assert1(SrcTy->isFPOrFPVectorTy(),"FPExt only operates on FP", &I); + Assert1(DestTy->isFPOrFPVectorTy(),"FPExt only produces an FP", &I); Assert1(isa<VectorType>(SrcTy) == isa<VectorType>(DestTy), "fpext source and destination must both be a vector or neither", &I); Assert1(SrcBitSize < DestBitSize,"DestTy too small for FPExt", &I); @@ -910,9 +926,9 @@ void Verifier::visitUIToFPInst(UIToFPInst &I) { Assert1(SrcVec == DstVec, "UIToFP source and dest must both be vector or scalar", &I); - Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVector(), + Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "UIToFP source must be integer or integer vector", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isFPOrFPVector(), + Assert1(DestTy->isFPOrFPVectorTy(), "UIToFP result must be FP or FP vector", &I); if (SrcVec && DstVec) @@ -933,9 +949,9 @@ void Verifier::visitSIToFPInst(SIToFPInst &I) { Assert1(SrcVec == DstVec, "SIToFP source and dest must both be vector or scalar", &I); - Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVector(), + Assert1(SrcTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "SIToFP source must be integer or integer vector", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isFPOrFPVector(), + Assert1(DestTy->isFPOrFPVectorTy(), "SIToFP result must be FP or FP vector", &I); if (SrcVec && DstVec) @@ -956,8 +972,9 @@ void Verifier::visitFPToUIInst(FPToUIInst &I) { Assert1(SrcVec == DstVec, "FPToUI source and dest must both be vector or scalar", &I); - Assert1(SrcTy->isFPOrFPVector(), "FPToUI source must be FP or FP vector", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVector(), + Assert1(SrcTy->isFPOrFPVectorTy(), "FPToUI source must be FP or FP vector", + &I); + Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "FPToUI result must be integer or integer vector", &I); if (SrcVec && DstVec) @@ -978,9 +995,9 @@ void Verifier::visitFPToSIInst(FPToSIInst &I) { Assert1(SrcVec == DstVec, "FPToSI source and dest must both be vector or scalar", &I); - Assert1(SrcTy->isFPOrFPVector(), + Assert1(SrcTy->isFPOrFPVectorTy(), "FPToSI source must be FP or FP vector", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVector(), + Assert1(DestTy->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "FPToSI result must be integer or integer vector", &I); if (SrcVec && DstVec) @@ -997,7 +1014,7 @@ void Verifier::visitPtrToIntInst(PtrToIntInst &I) { const Type *DestTy = I.getType(); Assert1(isa<PointerType>(SrcTy), "PtrToInt source must be pointer", &I); - Assert1(DestTy->isInteger(), "PtrToInt result must be integral", &I); + Assert1(DestTy->isIntegerTy(), "PtrToInt result must be integral", &I); visitInstruction(I); } @@ -1007,7 +1024,7 @@ void Verifier::visitIntToPtrInst(IntToPtrInst &I) { const Type *SrcTy = I.getOperand(0)->getType(); const Type *DestTy = I.getType(); - Assert1(SrcTy->isInteger(), "IntToPtr source must be an integral", &I); + Assert1(SrcTy->isIntegerTy(), "IntToPtr source must be an integral", &I); Assert1(isa<PointerType>(DestTy), "IntToPtr result must be a pointer",&I); visitInstruction(I); @@ -1150,7 +1167,7 @@ void Verifier::visitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperator &B) { case Instruction::UDiv: case Instruction::SRem: case Instruction::URem: - Assert1(B.getType()->isIntOrIntVector(), + Assert1(B.getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "Integer arithmetic operators only work with integral types!", &B); Assert1(B.getType() == B.getOperand(0)->getType(), "Integer arithmetic operators must have same type " @@ -1163,7 +1180,7 @@ void Verifier::visitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperator &B) { case Instruction::FMul: case Instruction::FDiv: case Instruction::FRem: - Assert1(B.getType()->isFPOrFPVector(), + Assert1(B.getType()->isFPOrFPVectorTy(), "Floating-point arithmetic operators only work with " "floating-point types!", &B); Assert1(B.getType() == B.getOperand(0)->getType(), @@ -1174,7 +1191,7 @@ void Verifier::visitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperator &B) { case Instruction::And: case Instruction::Or: case Instruction::Xor: - Assert1(B.getType()->isIntOrIntVector(), + Assert1(B.getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "Logical operators only work with integral types!", &B); Assert1(B.getType() == B.getOperand(0)->getType(), "Logical operators must have same type for operands and result!", @@ -1183,7 +1200,7 @@ void Verifier::visitBinaryOperator(BinaryOperator &B) { case Instruction::Shl: case Instruction::LShr: case Instruction::AShr: - Assert1(B.getType()->isIntOrIntVector(), + Assert1(B.getType()->isIntOrIntVectorTy(), "Shifts only work with integral types!", &B); Assert1(B.getType() == B.getOperand(0)->getType(), "Shift return type must be same as operands!", &B); @@ -1202,7 +1219,7 @@ void Verifier::visitICmpInst(ICmpInst& IC) { Assert1(Op0Ty == Op1Ty, "Both operands to ICmp instruction are not of the same type!", &IC); // Check that the operands are the right type - Assert1(Op0Ty->isIntOrIntVector() || isa<PointerType>(Op0Ty), + Assert1(Op0Ty->isIntOrIntVectorTy() || isa<PointerType>(Op0Ty), "Invalid operand types for ICmp instruction", &IC); visitInstruction(IC); @@ -1215,7 +1232,7 @@ void Verifier::visitFCmpInst(FCmpInst& FC) { Assert1(Op0Ty == Op1Ty, "Both operands to FCmp instruction are not of the same type!", &FC); // Check that the operands are the right type - Assert1(Op0Ty->isFPOrFPVector(), + Assert1(Op0Ty->isFPOrFPVectorTy(), "Invalid operand types for FCmp instruction", &FC); visitInstruction(FC); } @@ -1301,7 +1318,7 @@ void Verifier::visitAllocaInst(AllocaInst &AI) { &AI); Assert1(PTy->getElementType()->isSized(), "Cannot allocate unsized type", &AI); - Assert1(AI.getArraySize()->getType()->isInteger(32), + Assert1(AI.getArraySize()->getType()->isIntegerTy(32), "Alloca array size must be i32", &AI); visitInstruction(AI); } @@ -1480,7 +1497,7 @@ void Verifier::visitInstruction(Instruction &I) { void Verifier::VerifyType(const Type *Ty) { if (!Types.insert(Ty)) return; - Assert1(&Mod->getContext() == &Ty->getContext(), + Assert1(Context == &Ty->getContext(), "Type context does not match Module context!", Ty); switch (Ty->getTypeID()) { @@ -1733,7 +1750,7 @@ bool Verifier::PerformTypeCheck(Intrinsic::ID ID, Function *F, const Type *Ty, } } } else if (VT == MVT::iAny) { - if (!EltTy->isInteger()) { + if (!EltTy->isIntegerTy()) { CheckFailed(IntrinsicParam(ArgNo, NumRets) + " is not " "an integer type.", F); return false; @@ -1758,7 +1775,7 @@ bool Verifier::PerformTypeCheck(Intrinsic::ID ID, Function *F, const Type *Ty, break; } } else if (VT == MVT::fAny) { - if (!EltTy->isFloatingPoint()) { + if (!EltTy->isFloatingPointTy()) { CheckFailed(IntrinsicParam(ArgNo, NumRets) + " is not " "a floating-point type.", F); return false; @@ -1913,12 +1930,10 @@ bool llvm::verifyFunction(const Function &f, VerifierFailureAction action) { Function &F = const_cast<Function&>(f); assert(!F.isDeclaration() && "Cannot verify external functions"); - ExistingModuleProvider MP(F.getParent()); - FunctionPassManager FPM(&MP); + FunctionPassManager FPM(F.getParent()); Verifier *V = new Verifier(action); FPM.add(V); FPM.run(F); - MP.releaseModule(); return V->Broken; } |