summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/contrib/llvm/utils/TableGen/DisassemblerEmitter.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/llvm/utils/TableGen/DisassemblerEmitter.cpp')
-rw-r--r--contrib/llvm/utils/TableGen/DisassemblerEmitter.cpp142
1 files changed, 142 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/utils/TableGen/DisassemblerEmitter.cpp b/contrib/llvm/utils/TableGen/DisassemblerEmitter.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4650197
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contrib/llvm/utils/TableGen/DisassemblerEmitter.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+//===- DisassemblerEmitter.cpp - Generate a disassembler ------------------===//
+//
+// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "DisassemblerEmitter.h"
+#include "CodeGenTarget.h"
+#include "X86DisassemblerTables.h"
+#include "X86RecognizableInstr.h"
+#include "FixedLenDecoderEmitter.h"
+#include "llvm/TableGen/Error.h"
+#include "llvm/TableGen/Record.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+using namespace llvm::X86Disassembler;
+
+/// DisassemblerEmitter - Contains disassembler table emitters for various
+/// architectures.
+
+/// X86 Disassembler Emitter
+///
+/// *** IF YOU'RE HERE TO RESOLVE A "Primary decode conflict", LOOK DOWN NEAR
+/// THE END OF THIS COMMENT!
+///
+/// The X86 disassembler emitter is part of the X86 Disassembler, which is
+/// documented in lib/Target/X86/X86Disassembler.h.
+///
+/// The emitter produces the tables that the disassembler uses to translate
+/// instructions. The emitter generates the following tables:
+///
+/// - One table (CONTEXTS_SYM) that contains a mapping of attribute masks to
+/// instruction contexts. Although for each attribute there are cases where
+/// that attribute determines decoding, in the majority of cases decoding is
+/// the same whether or not an attribute is present. For example, a 64-bit
+/// instruction with an OPSIZE prefix and an XS prefix decodes the same way in
+/// all cases as a 64-bit instruction with only OPSIZE set. (The XS prefix
+/// may have effects on its execution, but does not change the instruction
+/// returned.) This allows considerable space savings in other tables.
+/// - Six tables (ONEBYTE_SYM, TWOBYTE_SYM, THREEBYTE38_SYM, THREEBYTE3A_SYM,
+/// THREEBYTEA6_SYM, and THREEBYTEA7_SYM contain the hierarchy that the
+/// decoder traverses while decoding an instruction. At the lowest level of
+/// this hierarchy are instruction UIDs, 16-bit integers that can be used to
+/// uniquely identify the instruction and correspond exactly to its position
+/// in the list of CodeGenInstructions for the target.
+/// - One table (INSTRUCTIONS_SYM) contains information about the operands of
+/// each instruction and how to decode them.
+///
+/// During table generation, there may be conflicts between instructions that
+/// occupy the same space in the decode tables. These conflicts are resolved as
+/// follows in setTableFields() (X86DisassemblerTables.cpp)
+///
+/// - If the current context is the native context for one of the instructions
+/// (that is, the attributes specified for it in the LLVM tables specify
+/// precisely the current context), then it has priority.
+/// - If the current context isn't native for either of the instructions, then
+/// the higher-priority context wins (that is, the one that is more specific).
+/// That hierarchy is determined by outranks() (X86DisassemblerTables.cpp)
+/// - If the current context is native for both instructions, then the table
+/// emitter reports a conflict and dies.
+///
+/// *** RESOLUTION FOR "Primary decode conflict"S
+///
+/// If two instructions collide, typically the solution is (in order of
+/// likelihood):
+///
+/// (1) to filter out one of the instructions by editing filter()
+/// (X86RecognizableInstr.cpp). This is the most common resolution, but
+/// check the Intel manuals first to make sure that (2) and (3) are not the
+/// problem.
+/// (2) to fix the tables (X86.td and its subsidiaries) so the opcodes are
+/// accurate. Sometimes they are not.
+/// (3) to fix the tables to reflect the actual context (for example, required
+/// prefixes), and possibly to add a new context by editing
+/// lib/Target/X86/X86DisassemblerDecoderCommon.h. This is unlikely to be
+/// the cause.
+///
+/// DisassemblerEmitter.cpp contains the implementation for the emitter,
+/// which simply pulls out instructions from the CodeGenTarget and pushes them
+/// into X86DisassemblerTables.
+/// X86DisassemblerTables.h contains the interface for the instruction tables,
+/// which manage and emit the structures discussed above.
+/// X86DisassemblerTables.cpp contains the implementation for the instruction
+/// tables.
+/// X86ModRMFilters.h contains filters that can be used to determine which
+/// ModR/M values are valid for a particular instruction. These are used to
+/// populate ModRMDecisions.
+/// X86RecognizableInstr.h contains the interface for a single instruction,
+/// which knows how to translate itself from a CodeGenInstruction and provide
+/// the information necessary for integration into the tables.
+/// X86RecognizableInstr.cpp contains the implementation for a single
+/// instruction.
+
+void DisassemblerEmitter::run(raw_ostream &OS) {
+ CodeGenTarget Target(Records);
+
+ OS << "/*===- TableGen'erated file "
+ << "---------------------------------------*- C -*-===*\n"
+ << " *\n"
+ << " * " << Target.getName() << " Disassembler\n"
+ << " *\n"
+ << " * Automatically generated file, do not edit!\n"
+ << " *\n"
+ << " *===---------------------------------------------------------------"
+ << "-------===*/\n";
+
+ // X86 uses a custom disassembler.
+ if (Target.getName() == "X86") {
+ DisassemblerTables Tables;
+
+ const std::vector<const CodeGenInstruction*> &numberedInstructions =
+ Target.getInstructionsByEnumValue();
+
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = numberedInstructions.size(); i != e; ++i)
+ RecognizableInstr::processInstr(Tables, *numberedInstructions[i], i);
+
+ // FIXME: As long as we are using exceptions, might as well drop this to the
+ // actual conflict site.
+ if (Tables.hasConflicts())
+ throw TGError(Target.getTargetRecord()->getLoc(),
+ "Primary decode conflict");
+
+ Tables.emit(OS);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // ARM and Thumb have a CHECK() macro to deal with DecodeStatuses.
+ if (Target.getName() == "ARM" ||
+ Target.getName() == "Thumb") {
+ FixedLenDecoderEmitter(Records,
+ "ARM",
+ "if (!Check(S, ", ")) return MCDisassembler::Fail;",
+ "S", "MCDisassembler::Fail",
+ " MCDisassembler::DecodeStatus S = MCDisassembler::Success;\n(void)S;").run(OS);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ FixedLenDecoderEmitter(Records, Target.getName()).run(OS);
+}
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud