summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp')
-rw-r--r--contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp604
1 files changed, 481 insertions, 123 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
index e46c679..37123d0 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstructionCombining.cpp
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
#include "llvm/Support/PatternMatch.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
+#include "llvm-c/Initialization.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include <climits>
using namespace llvm;
@@ -57,11 +58,22 @@ STATISTIC(NumCombined , "Number of insts combined");
STATISTIC(NumConstProp, "Number of constant folds");
STATISTIC(NumDeadInst , "Number of dead inst eliminated");
STATISTIC(NumSunkInst , "Number of instructions sunk");
+STATISTIC(NumExpand, "Number of expansions");
+STATISTIC(NumFactor , "Number of factorizations");
+STATISTIC(NumReassoc , "Number of reassociations");
+// Initialization Routines
+void llvm::initializeInstCombine(PassRegistry &Registry) {
+ initializeInstCombinerPass(Registry);
+}
+
+void LLVMInitializeInstCombine(LLVMPassRegistryRef R) {
+ initializeInstCombine(*unwrap(R));
+}
char InstCombiner::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS(InstCombiner, "instcombine",
- "Combine redundant instructions", false, false);
+ "Combine redundant instructions", false, false)
void InstCombiner::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.addPreservedID(LCSSAID);
@@ -97,53 +109,326 @@ bool InstCombiner::ShouldChangeType(const Type *From, const Type *To) const {
}
-// SimplifyCommutative - This performs a few simplifications for commutative
-// operators:
+/// SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative - This performs a few simplifications for
+/// operators which are associative or commutative:
+//
+// Commutative operators:
//
// 1. Order operands such that they are listed from right (least complex) to
// left (most complex). This puts constants before unary operators before
// binary operators.
//
-// 2. Transform: (op (op V, C1), C2) ==> (op V, (op C1, C2))
-// 3. Transform: (op (op V1, C1), (op V2, C2)) ==> (op (op V1, V2), (op C1,C2))
+// Associative operators:
+//
+// 2. Transform: "(A op B) op C" ==> "A op (B op C)" if "B op C" simplifies.
+// 3. Transform: "A op (B op C)" ==> "(A op B) op C" if "A op B" simplifies.
+//
+// Associative and commutative operators:
+//
+// 4. Transform: "(A op B) op C" ==> "(C op A) op B" if "C op A" simplifies.
+// 5. Transform: "A op (B op C)" ==> "B op (C op A)" if "C op A" simplifies.
+// 6. Transform: "(A op C1) op (B op C2)" ==> "(A op B) op (C1 op C2)"
+// if C1 and C2 are constants.
//
-bool InstCombiner::SimplifyCommutative(BinaryOperator &I) {
+bool InstCombiner::SimplifyAssociativeOrCommutative(BinaryOperator &I) {
+ Instruction::BinaryOps Opcode = I.getOpcode();
bool Changed = false;
- if (getComplexity(I.getOperand(0)) < getComplexity(I.getOperand(1)))
- Changed = !I.swapOperands();
- if (!I.isAssociative()) return Changed;
-
- Instruction::BinaryOps Opcode = I.getOpcode();
- if (BinaryOperator *Op = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(I.getOperand(0)))
- if (Op->getOpcode() == Opcode && isa<Constant>(Op->getOperand(1))) {
- if (isa<Constant>(I.getOperand(1))) {
- Constant *Folded = ConstantExpr::get(I.getOpcode(),
- cast<Constant>(I.getOperand(1)),
- cast<Constant>(Op->getOperand(1)));
- I.setOperand(0, Op->getOperand(0));
- I.setOperand(1, Folded);
- return true;
+ do {
+ // Order operands such that they are listed from right (least complex) to
+ // left (most complex). This puts constants before unary operators before
+ // binary operators.
+ if (I.isCommutative() && getComplexity(I.getOperand(0)) <
+ getComplexity(I.getOperand(1)))
+ Changed = !I.swapOperands();
+
+ BinaryOperator *Op0 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(I.getOperand(0));
+ BinaryOperator *Op1 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(I.getOperand(1));
+
+ if (I.isAssociative()) {
+ // Transform: "(A op B) op C" ==> "A op (B op C)" if "B op C" simplifies.
+ if (Op0 && Op0->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
+ Value *A = Op0->getOperand(0);
+ Value *B = Op0->getOperand(1);
+ Value *C = I.getOperand(1);
+
+ // Does "B op C" simplify?
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, B, C, TD)) {
+ // It simplifies to V. Form "A op V".
+ I.setOperand(0, A);
+ I.setOperand(1, V);
+ // Conservatively clear the optional flags, since they may not be
+ // preserved by the reassociation.
+ I.clearSubclassOptionalData();
+ Changed = true;
+ ++NumReassoc;
+ continue;
+ }
}
-
- if (BinaryOperator *Op1 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(I.getOperand(1)))
- if (Op1->getOpcode() == Opcode && isa<Constant>(Op1->getOperand(1)) &&
- Op->hasOneUse() && Op1->hasOneUse()) {
- Constant *C1 = cast<Constant>(Op->getOperand(1));
- Constant *C2 = cast<Constant>(Op1->getOperand(1));
-
- // Fold (op (op V1, C1), (op V2, C2)) ==> (op (op V1, V2), (op C1,C2))
- Constant *Folded = ConstantExpr::get(I.getOpcode(), C1, C2);
- Instruction *New = BinaryOperator::Create(Opcode, Op->getOperand(0),
- Op1->getOperand(0),
- Op1->getName(), &I);
- Worklist.Add(New);
- I.setOperand(0, New);
- I.setOperand(1, Folded);
- return true;
+
+ // Transform: "A op (B op C)" ==> "(A op B) op C" if "A op B" simplifies.
+ if (Op1 && Op1->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
+ Value *A = I.getOperand(0);
+ Value *B = Op1->getOperand(0);
+ Value *C = Op1->getOperand(1);
+
+ // Does "A op B" simplify?
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, A, B, TD)) {
+ // It simplifies to V. Form "V op C".
+ I.setOperand(0, V);
+ I.setOperand(1, C);
+ // Conservatively clear the optional flags, since they may not be
+ // preserved by the reassociation.
+ I.clearSubclassOptionalData();
+ Changed = true;
+ ++NumReassoc;
+ continue;
}
+ }
}
- return Changed;
+
+ if (I.isAssociative() && I.isCommutative()) {
+ // Transform: "(A op B) op C" ==> "(C op A) op B" if "C op A" simplifies.
+ if (Op0 && Op0->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
+ Value *A = Op0->getOperand(0);
+ Value *B = Op0->getOperand(1);
+ Value *C = I.getOperand(1);
+
+ // Does "C op A" simplify?
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, C, A, TD)) {
+ // It simplifies to V. Form "V op B".
+ I.setOperand(0, V);
+ I.setOperand(1, B);
+ // Conservatively clear the optional flags, since they may not be
+ // preserved by the reassociation.
+ I.clearSubclassOptionalData();
+ Changed = true;
+ ++NumReassoc;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Transform: "A op (B op C)" ==> "B op (C op A)" if "C op A" simplifies.
+ if (Op1 && Op1->getOpcode() == Opcode) {
+ Value *A = I.getOperand(0);
+ Value *B = Op1->getOperand(0);
+ Value *C = Op1->getOperand(1);
+
+ // Does "C op A" simplify?
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(Opcode, C, A, TD)) {
+ // It simplifies to V. Form "B op V".
+ I.setOperand(0, B);
+ I.setOperand(1, V);
+ // Conservatively clear the optional flags, since they may not be
+ // preserved by the reassociation.
+ I.clearSubclassOptionalData();
+ Changed = true;
+ ++NumReassoc;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Transform: "(A op C1) op (B op C2)" ==> "(A op B) op (C1 op C2)"
+ // if C1 and C2 are constants.
+ if (Op0 && Op1 &&
+ Op0->getOpcode() == Opcode && Op1->getOpcode() == Opcode &&
+ isa<Constant>(Op0->getOperand(1)) &&
+ isa<Constant>(Op1->getOperand(1)) &&
+ Op0->hasOneUse() && Op1->hasOneUse()) {
+ Value *A = Op0->getOperand(0);
+ Constant *C1 = cast<Constant>(Op0->getOperand(1));
+ Value *B = Op1->getOperand(0);
+ Constant *C2 = cast<Constant>(Op1->getOperand(1));
+
+ Constant *Folded = ConstantExpr::get(Opcode, C1, C2);
+ Instruction *New = BinaryOperator::Create(Opcode, A, B, Op1->getName(),
+ &I);
+ Worklist.Add(New);
+ I.setOperand(0, New);
+ I.setOperand(1, Folded);
+ // Conservatively clear the optional flags, since they may not be
+ // preserved by the reassociation.
+ I.clearSubclassOptionalData();
+ Changed = true;
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // No further simplifications.
+ return Changed;
+ } while (1);
+}
+
+/// LeftDistributesOverRight - Whether "X LOp (Y ROp Z)" is always equal to
+/// "(X LOp Y) ROp (X LOp Z)".
+static bool LeftDistributesOverRight(Instruction::BinaryOps LOp,
+ Instruction::BinaryOps ROp) {
+ switch (LOp) {
+ default:
+ return false;
+
+ case Instruction::And:
+ // And distributes over Or and Xor.
+ switch (ROp) {
+ default:
+ return false;
+ case Instruction::Or:
+ case Instruction::Xor:
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ case Instruction::Mul:
+ // Multiplication distributes over addition and subtraction.
+ switch (ROp) {
+ default:
+ return false;
+ case Instruction::Add:
+ case Instruction::Sub:
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ case Instruction::Or:
+ // Or distributes over And.
+ switch (ROp) {
+ default:
+ return false;
+ case Instruction::And:
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/// RightDistributesOverLeft - Whether "(X LOp Y) ROp Z" is always equal to
+/// "(X ROp Z) LOp (Y ROp Z)".
+static bool RightDistributesOverLeft(Instruction::BinaryOps LOp,
+ Instruction::BinaryOps ROp) {
+ if (Instruction::isCommutative(ROp))
+ return LeftDistributesOverRight(ROp, LOp);
+ // TODO: It would be nice to handle division, aka "(X + Y)/Z = X/Z + Y/Z",
+ // but this requires knowing that the addition does not overflow and other
+ // such subtleties.
+ return false;
+}
+
+/// SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws - This tries to simplify binary operations
+/// which some other binary operation distributes over either by factorizing
+/// out common terms (eg "(A*B)+(A*C)" -> "A*(B+C)") or expanding out if this
+/// results in simplifications (eg: "A & (B | C) -> (A&B) | (A&C)" if this is
+/// a win). Returns the simplified value, or null if it didn't simplify.
+Value *InstCombiner::SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws(BinaryOperator &I) {
+ Value *LHS = I.getOperand(0), *RHS = I.getOperand(1);
+ BinaryOperator *Op0 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHS);
+ BinaryOperator *Op1 = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(RHS);
+ Instruction::BinaryOps TopLevelOpcode = I.getOpcode(); // op
+
+ // Factorization.
+ if (Op0 && Op1 && Op0->getOpcode() == Op1->getOpcode()) {
+ // The instruction has the form "(A op' B) op (C op' D)". Try to factorize
+ // a common term.
+ Value *A = Op0->getOperand(0), *B = Op0->getOperand(1);
+ Value *C = Op1->getOperand(0), *D = Op1->getOperand(1);
+ Instruction::BinaryOps InnerOpcode = Op0->getOpcode(); // op'
+
+ // Does "X op' Y" always equal "Y op' X"?
+ bool InnerCommutative = Instruction::isCommutative(InnerOpcode);
+
+ // Does "X op' (Y op Z)" always equal "(X op' Y) op (X op' Z)"?
+ if (LeftDistributesOverRight(InnerOpcode, TopLevelOpcode))
+ // Does the instruction have the form "(A op' B) op (A op' D)" or, in the
+ // commutative case, "(A op' B) op (C op' A)"?
+ if (A == C || (InnerCommutative && A == D)) {
+ if (A != C)
+ std::swap(C, D);
+ // Consider forming "A op' (B op D)".
+ // If "B op D" simplifies then it can be formed with no cost.
+ Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(TopLevelOpcode, B, D, TD);
+ // If "B op D" doesn't simplify then only go on if both of the existing
+ // operations "A op' B" and "C op' D" will be zapped as no longer used.
+ if (!V && Op0->hasOneUse() && Op1->hasOneUse())
+ V = Builder->CreateBinOp(TopLevelOpcode, B, D, Op1->getName());
+ if (V) {
+ ++NumFactor;
+ V = Builder->CreateBinOp(InnerOpcode, A, V);
+ V->takeName(&I);
+ return V;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Does "(X op Y) op' Z" always equal "(X op' Z) op (Y op' Z)"?
+ if (RightDistributesOverLeft(TopLevelOpcode, InnerOpcode))
+ // Does the instruction have the form "(A op' B) op (C op' B)" or, in the
+ // commutative case, "(A op' B) op (B op' D)"?
+ if (B == D || (InnerCommutative && B == C)) {
+ if (B != D)
+ std::swap(C, D);
+ // Consider forming "(A op C) op' B".
+ // If "A op C" simplifies then it can be formed with no cost.
+ Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(TopLevelOpcode, A, C, TD);
+ // If "A op C" doesn't simplify then only go on if both of the existing
+ // operations "A op' B" and "C op' D" will be zapped as no longer used.
+ if (!V && Op0->hasOneUse() && Op1->hasOneUse())
+ V = Builder->CreateBinOp(TopLevelOpcode, A, C, Op0->getName());
+ if (V) {
+ ++NumFactor;
+ V = Builder->CreateBinOp(InnerOpcode, V, B);
+ V->takeName(&I);
+ return V;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Expansion.
+ if (Op0 && RightDistributesOverLeft(Op0->getOpcode(), TopLevelOpcode)) {
+ // The instruction has the form "(A op' B) op C". See if expanding it out
+ // to "(A op C) op' (B op C)" results in simplifications.
+ Value *A = Op0->getOperand(0), *B = Op0->getOperand(1), *C = RHS;
+ Instruction::BinaryOps InnerOpcode = Op0->getOpcode(); // op'
+
+ // Do "A op C" and "B op C" both simplify?
+ if (Value *L = SimplifyBinOp(TopLevelOpcode, A, C, TD))
+ if (Value *R = SimplifyBinOp(TopLevelOpcode, B, C, TD)) {
+ // They do! Return "L op' R".
+ ++NumExpand;
+ // If "L op' R" equals "A op' B" then "L op' R" is just the LHS.
+ if ((L == A && R == B) ||
+ (Instruction::isCommutative(InnerOpcode) && L == B && R == A))
+ return Op0;
+ // Otherwise return "L op' R" if it simplifies.
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(InnerOpcode, L, R, TD))
+ return V;
+ // Otherwise, create a new instruction.
+ C = Builder->CreateBinOp(InnerOpcode, L, R);
+ C->takeName(&I);
+ return C;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (Op1 && LeftDistributesOverRight(TopLevelOpcode, Op1->getOpcode())) {
+ // The instruction has the form "A op (B op' C)". See if expanding it out
+ // to "(A op B) op' (A op C)" results in simplifications.
+ Value *A = LHS, *B = Op1->getOperand(0), *C = Op1->getOperand(1);
+ Instruction::BinaryOps InnerOpcode = Op1->getOpcode(); // op'
+
+ // Do "A op B" and "A op C" both simplify?
+ if (Value *L = SimplifyBinOp(TopLevelOpcode, A, B, TD))
+ if (Value *R = SimplifyBinOp(TopLevelOpcode, A, C, TD)) {
+ // They do! Return "L op' R".
+ ++NumExpand;
+ // If "L op' R" equals "B op' C" then "L op' R" is just the RHS.
+ if ((L == B && R == C) ||
+ (Instruction::isCommutative(InnerOpcode) && L == C && R == B))
+ return Op1;
+ // Otherwise return "L op' R" if it simplifies.
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyBinOp(InnerOpcode, L, R, TD))
+ return V;
+ // Otherwise, create a new instruction.
+ A = Builder->CreateBinOp(InnerOpcode, L, R);
+ A->takeName(&I);
+ return A;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
// dyn_castNegVal - Given a 'sub' instruction, return the RHS of the instruction
@@ -185,8 +470,9 @@ Value *InstCombiner::dyn_castFNegVal(Value *V) const {
static Value *FoldOperationIntoSelectOperand(Instruction &I, Value *SO,
InstCombiner *IC) {
- if (CastInst *CI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(&I))
+ if (CastInst *CI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(&I)) {
return IC->Builder->CreateCast(CI->getOpcode(), SO, I.getType());
+ }
// Figure out if the constant is the left or the right argument.
bool ConstIsRHS = isa<Constant>(I.getOperand(1));
@@ -228,11 +514,24 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoSelect(Instruction &Op, SelectInst *SI) {
// Bool selects with constant operands can be folded to logical ops.
if (SI->getType()->isIntegerTy(1)) return 0;
+ // If it's a bitcast involving vectors, make sure it has the same number of
+ // elements on both sides.
+ if (BitCastInst *BC = dyn_cast<BitCastInst>(&Op)) {
+ const VectorType *DestTy = dyn_cast<VectorType>(BC->getDestTy());
+ const VectorType *SrcTy = dyn_cast<VectorType>(BC->getSrcTy());
+
+ // Verify that either both or neither are vectors.
+ if ((SrcTy == NULL) != (DestTy == NULL)) return 0;
+ // If vectors, verify that they have the same number of elements.
+ if (SrcTy && SrcTy->getNumElements() != DestTy->getNumElements())
+ return 0;
+ }
+
Value *SelectTrueVal = FoldOperationIntoSelectOperand(Op, TV, this);
Value *SelectFalseVal = FoldOperationIntoSelectOperand(Op, FV, this);
- return SelectInst::Create(SI->getCondition(), SelectTrueVal,
- SelectFalseVal);
+ return SelectInst::Create(SI->getCondition(),
+ SelectTrueVal, SelectFalseVal);
}
return 0;
}
@@ -242,20 +541,25 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoSelect(Instruction &Op, SelectInst *SI) {
/// has a PHI node as operand #0, see if we can fold the instruction into the
/// PHI (which is only possible if all operands to the PHI are constants).
///
-/// If AllowAggressive is true, FoldOpIntoPhi will allow certain transforms
-/// that would normally be unprofitable because they strongly encourage jump
-/// threading.
-Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoPhi(Instruction &I,
- bool AllowAggressive) {
- AllowAggressive = false;
+Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoPhi(Instruction &I) {
PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(I.getOperand(0));
unsigned NumPHIValues = PN->getNumIncomingValues();
- if (NumPHIValues == 0 ||
- // We normally only transform phis with a single use, unless we're trying
- // hard to make jump threading happen.
- (!PN->hasOneUse() && !AllowAggressive))
+ if (NumPHIValues == 0)
return 0;
+ // We normally only transform phis with a single use. However, if a PHI has
+ // multiple uses and they are all the same operation, we can fold *all* of the
+ // uses into the PHI.
+ if (!PN->hasOneUse()) {
+ // Walk the use list for the instruction, comparing them to I.
+ for (Value::use_iterator UI = PN->use_begin(), E = PN->use_end();
+ UI != E; ++UI) {
+ Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(*UI);
+ if (User != &I && !I.isIdenticalTo(User))
+ return 0;
+ }
+ // Otherwise, we can replace *all* users with the new PHI we form.
+ }
// Check to see if all of the operands of the PHI are simple constants
// (constantint/constantfp/undef). If there is one non-constant value,
@@ -263,24 +567,34 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoPhi(Instruction &I,
// bail out. We don't do arbitrary constant expressions here because moving
// their computation can be expensive without a cost model.
BasicBlock *NonConstBB = 0;
- for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumPHIValues; ++i)
- if (!isa<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(i)) ||
- isa<ConstantExpr>(PN->getIncomingValue(i))) {
- if (NonConstBB) return 0; // More than one non-const value.
- if (isa<PHINode>(PN->getIncomingValue(i))) return 0; // Itself a phi.
- NonConstBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
-
- // If the incoming non-constant value is in I's block, we have an infinite
- // loop.
- if (NonConstBB == I.getParent())
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumPHIValues; ++i) {
+ Value *InVal = PN->getIncomingValue(i);
+ if (isa<Constant>(InVal) && !isa<ConstantExpr>(InVal))
+ continue;
+
+ if (isa<PHINode>(InVal)) return 0; // Itself a phi.
+ if (NonConstBB) return 0; // More than one non-const value.
+
+ NonConstBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
+
+ // If the InVal is an invoke at the end of the pred block, then we can't
+ // insert a computation after it without breaking the edge.
+ if (InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(InVal))
+ if (II->getParent() == NonConstBB)
return 0;
- }
+
+ // If the incoming non-constant value is in I's block, we will remove one
+ // instruction, but insert another equivalent one, leading to infinite
+ // instcombine.
+ if (NonConstBB == I.getParent())
+ return 0;
+ }
// If there is exactly one non-constant value, we can insert a copy of the
// operation in that block. However, if this is a critical edge, we would be
// inserting the computation one some other paths (e.g. inside a loop). Only
// do this if the pred block is unconditionally branching into the phi block.
- if (NonConstBB != 0 && !AllowAggressive) {
+ if (NonConstBB != 0) {
BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(NonConstBB->getTerminator());
if (!BI || !BI->isUnconditional()) return 0;
}
@@ -290,7 +604,12 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoPhi(Instruction &I,
NewPN->reserveOperandSpace(PN->getNumOperands()/2);
InsertNewInstBefore(NewPN, *PN);
NewPN->takeName(PN);
-
+
+ // If we are going to have to insert a new computation, do so right before the
+ // predecessors terminator.
+ if (NonConstBB)
+ Builder->SetInsertPoint(NonConstBB->getTerminator());
+
// Next, add all of the operands to the PHI.
if (SelectInst *SI = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(&I)) {
// We only currently try to fold the condition of a select when it is a phi,
@@ -303,42 +622,36 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoPhi(Instruction &I,
Value *TrueVInPred = TrueV->DoPHITranslation(PhiTransBB, ThisBB);
Value *FalseVInPred = FalseV->DoPHITranslation(PhiTransBB, ThisBB);
Value *InV = 0;
- if (Constant *InC = dyn_cast<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(i))) {
+ if (Constant *InC = dyn_cast<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(i)))
InV = InC->isNullValue() ? FalseVInPred : TrueVInPred;
- } else {
- assert(PN->getIncomingBlock(i) == NonConstBB);
- InV = SelectInst::Create(PN->getIncomingValue(i), TrueVInPred,
- FalseVInPred,
- "phitmp", NonConstBB->getTerminator());
- Worklist.Add(cast<Instruction>(InV));
- }
+ else
+ InV = Builder->CreateSelect(PN->getIncomingValue(i),
+ TrueVInPred, FalseVInPred, "phitmp");
NewPN->addIncoming(InV, ThisBB);
}
+ } else if (CmpInst *CI = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(&I)) {
+ Constant *C = cast<Constant>(I.getOperand(1));
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumPHIValues; ++i) {
+ Value *InV = 0;
+ if (Constant *InC = dyn_cast<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(i)))
+ InV = ConstantExpr::getCompare(CI->getPredicate(), InC, C);
+ else if (isa<ICmpInst>(CI))
+ InV = Builder->CreateICmp(CI->getPredicate(), PN->getIncomingValue(i),
+ C, "phitmp");
+ else
+ InV = Builder->CreateFCmp(CI->getPredicate(), PN->getIncomingValue(i),
+ C, "phitmp");
+ NewPN->addIncoming(InV, PN->getIncomingBlock(i));
+ }
} else if (I.getNumOperands() == 2) {
Constant *C = cast<Constant>(I.getOperand(1));
for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumPHIValues; ++i) {
Value *InV = 0;
- if (Constant *InC = dyn_cast<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(i))) {
- if (CmpInst *CI = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(&I))
- InV = ConstantExpr::getCompare(CI->getPredicate(), InC, C);
- else
- InV = ConstantExpr::get(I.getOpcode(), InC, C);
- } else {
- assert(PN->getIncomingBlock(i) == NonConstBB);
- if (BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(&I))
- InV = BinaryOperator::Create(BO->getOpcode(),
- PN->getIncomingValue(i), C, "phitmp",
- NonConstBB->getTerminator());
- else if (CmpInst *CI = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(&I))
- InV = CmpInst::Create(CI->getOpcode(),
- CI->getPredicate(),
- PN->getIncomingValue(i), C, "phitmp",
- NonConstBB->getTerminator());
- else
- llvm_unreachable("Unknown binop!");
-
- Worklist.Add(cast<Instruction>(InV));
- }
+ if (Constant *InC = dyn_cast<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(i)))
+ InV = ConstantExpr::get(I.getOpcode(), InC, C);
+ else
+ InV = Builder->CreateBinOp(cast<BinaryOperator>(I).getOpcode(),
+ PN->getIncomingValue(i), C, "phitmp");
NewPN->addIncoming(InV, PN->getIncomingBlock(i));
}
} else {
@@ -346,18 +659,22 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::FoldOpIntoPhi(Instruction &I,
const Type *RetTy = CI->getType();
for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumPHIValues; ++i) {
Value *InV;
- if (Constant *InC = dyn_cast<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(i))) {
+ if (Constant *InC = dyn_cast<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(i)))
InV = ConstantExpr::getCast(CI->getOpcode(), InC, RetTy);
- } else {
- assert(PN->getIncomingBlock(i) == NonConstBB);
- InV = CastInst::Create(CI->getOpcode(), PN->getIncomingValue(i),
- I.getType(), "phitmp",
- NonConstBB->getTerminator());
- Worklist.Add(cast<Instruction>(InV));
- }
+ else
+ InV = Builder->CreateCast(CI->getOpcode(),
+ PN->getIncomingValue(i), I.getType(), "phitmp");
NewPN->addIncoming(InV, PN->getIncomingBlock(i));
}
}
+
+ for (Value::use_iterator UI = PN->use_begin(), E = PN->use_end();
+ UI != E; ) {
+ Instruction *User = cast<Instruction>(*UI++);
+ if (User == &I) continue;
+ ReplaceInstUsesWith(*User, NewPN);
+ EraseInstFromFunction(*User);
+ }
return ReplaceInstUsesWith(I, NewPN);
}
@@ -432,28 +749,35 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitGetElementPtrInst(GetElementPtrInst &GEP) {
Value *PtrOp = GEP.getOperand(0);
- if (isa<UndefValue>(GEP.getOperand(0)))
- return ReplaceInstUsesWith(GEP, UndefValue::get(GEP.getType()));
-
- // Eliminate unneeded casts for indices.
+ // Eliminate unneeded casts for indices, and replace indices which displace
+ // by multiples of a zero size type with zero.
if (TD) {
bool MadeChange = false;
- unsigned PtrSize = TD->getPointerSizeInBits();
-
+ const Type *IntPtrTy = TD->getIntPtrType(GEP.getContext());
+
gep_type_iterator GTI = gep_type_begin(GEP);
for (User::op_iterator I = GEP.op_begin() + 1, E = GEP.op_end();
I != E; ++I, ++GTI) {
- if (!isa<SequentialType>(*GTI)) continue;
-
- // If we are using a wider index than needed for this platform, shrink it
- // to what we need. If narrower, sign-extend it to what we need. This
- // explicit cast can make subsequent optimizations more obvious.
- unsigned OpBits = cast<IntegerType>((*I)->getType())->getBitWidth();
- if (OpBits == PtrSize)
- continue;
-
- *I = Builder->CreateIntCast(*I, TD->getIntPtrType(GEP.getContext()),true);
- MadeChange = true;
+ // Skip indices into struct types.
+ const SequentialType *SeqTy = dyn_cast<SequentialType>(*GTI);
+ if (!SeqTy) continue;
+
+ // If the element type has zero size then any index over it is equivalent
+ // to an index of zero, so replace it with zero if it is not zero already.
+ if (SeqTy->getElementType()->isSized() &&
+ TD->getTypeAllocSize(SeqTy->getElementType()) == 0)
+ if (!isa<Constant>(*I) || !cast<Constant>(*I)->isNullValue()) {
+ *I = Constant::getNullValue(IntPtrTy);
+ MadeChange = true;
+ }
+
+ if ((*I)->getType() != IntPtrTy) {
+ // If we are using a wider index than needed for this platform, shrink
+ // it to what we need. If narrower, sign-extend it to what we need.
+ // This explicit cast can make subsequent optimizations more obvious.
+ *I = Builder->CreateIntCast(*I, IntPtrTy, true);
+ MadeChange = true;
+ }
}
if (MadeChange) return &GEP;
}
@@ -940,6 +1264,14 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitExtractValueInst(ExtractValueInst &EV) {
EraseInstFromFunction(*II);
return BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(LHS, RHS);
}
+
+ // If the normal result of the add is dead, and the RHS is a constant,
+ // we can transform this into a range comparison.
+ // overflow = uadd a, -4 --> overflow = icmp ugt a, 3
+ if (II->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::uadd_with_overflow)
+ if (ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(II->getArgOperand(1)))
+ return new ICmpInst(ICmpInst::ICMP_UGT, II->getArgOperand(0),
+ ConstantExpr::getNot(CI));
break;
case Intrinsic::usub_with_overflow:
case Intrinsic::ssub_with_overflow:
@@ -964,10 +1296,37 @@ Instruction *InstCombiner::visitExtractValueInst(ExtractValueInst &EV) {
}
}
}
- // Can't simplify extracts from other values. Note that nested extracts are
- // already simplified implicitely by the above (extract ( extract (insert) )
+ if (LoadInst *L = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(Agg))
+ // If the (non-volatile) load only has one use, we can rewrite this to a
+ // load from a GEP. This reduces the size of the load.
+ // FIXME: If a load is used only by extractvalue instructions then this
+ // could be done regardless of having multiple uses.
+ if (!L->isVolatile() && L->hasOneUse()) {
+ // extractvalue has integer indices, getelementptr has Value*s. Convert.
+ SmallVector<Value*, 4> Indices;
+ // Prefix an i32 0 since we need the first element.
+ Indices.push_back(Builder->getInt32(0));
+ for (ExtractValueInst::idx_iterator I = EV.idx_begin(), E = EV.idx_end();
+ I != E; ++I)
+ Indices.push_back(Builder->getInt32(*I));
+
+ // We need to insert these at the location of the old load, not at that of
+ // the extractvalue.
+ Builder->SetInsertPoint(L->getParent(), L);
+ Value *GEP = Builder->CreateInBoundsGEP(L->getPointerOperand(),
+ Indices.begin(), Indices.end());
+ // Returning the load directly will cause the main loop to insert it in
+ // the wrong spot, so use ReplaceInstUsesWith().
+ return ReplaceInstUsesWith(EV, Builder->CreateLoad(GEP));
+ }
+ // We could simplify extracts from other values. Note that nested extracts may
+ // already be simplified implicitly by the above: extract (extract (insert) )
// will be translated into extract ( insert ( extract ) ) first and then just
- // the value inserted, if appropriate).
+ // the value inserted, if appropriate. Similarly for extracts from single-use
+ // loads: extract (extract (load)) will be translated to extract (load (gep))
+ // and if again single-use then via load (gep (gep)) to load (gep).
+ // However, double extracts from e.g. function arguments or return values
+ // aren't handled yet.
return 0;
}
@@ -1023,10 +1382,8 @@ static bool AddReachableCodeToWorklist(BasicBlock *BB,
bool MadeIRChange = false;
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 256> Worklist;
Worklist.push_back(BB);
-
- std::vector<Instruction*> InstrsForInstCombineWorklist;
- InstrsForInstCombineWorklist.reserve(128);
+ SmallVector<Instruction*, 128> InstrsForInstCombineWorklist;
SmallPtrSet<ConstantExpr*, 64> FoldedConstants;
do {
@@ -1231,6 +1588,7 @@ bool InstCombiner::DoOneIteration(Function &F, unsigned Iteration) {
DEBUG(errs() << "IC: Old = " << *I << '\n'
<< " New = " << *Result << '\n');
+ Result->setDebugLoc(I->getDebugLoc());
// Everything uses the new instruction now.
I->replaceAllUsesWith(Result);
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud