1 files changed, 70 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/MC/MCInstrDesc.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/MC/MCInstrDesc.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..decc2d8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/MC/MCInstrDesc.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+//===------ llvm/MC/MCInstrDesc.cpp- Instruction Descriptors --------------===//
+//
+//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
+// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This file defines methods on the MCOperandInfo and MCInstrDesc classes, which
+// are used to describe target instructions and their operands.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/MC/MCInstrDesc.h"
+#include "llvm/MC/MCInst.h"
+#include "llvm/MC/MCRegisterInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/MC/MCSubtargetInfo.h"
+
+using namespace llvm;
+
+bool MCInstrDesc::getDeprecatedInfo(MCInst &MI, MCSubtargetInfo &STI,
+                                    std::string &Info) const {
+  if (ComplexDeprecationInfo)
+    return ComplexDeprecationInfo(MI, STI, Info);
+  if (DeprecatedFeature != -1 && STI.getFeatureBits()[DeprecatedFeature]) {
+    // FIXME: it would be nice to include the subtarget feature here.
+    Info = "deprecated";
+    return true;
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+bool MCInstrDesc::mayAffectControlFlow(const MCInst &MI,
+                                       const MCRegisterInfo &RI) const {
+  if (isBranch() || isCall() || isReturn() || isIndirectBranch())
+    return true;
+  unsigned PC = RI.getProgramCounter();
+  if (PC == 0)
+    return false;
+  if (hasDefOfPhysReg(MI, PC, RI))
+    return true;
+  // A variadic instruction may define PC in the variable operand list.
+  // There's currently no indication of which entries in a variable
+  // list are defs and which are uses. While that's the case, this function
+  // needs to assume they're defs in order to be conservatively correct.
+  for (int i = NumOperands, e = MI.getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
+    if (MI.getOperand(i).isReg() &&
+        RI.isSubRegisterEq(PC, MI.getOperand(i).getReg()))
+      return true;
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+bool MCInstrDesc::hasImplicitDefOfPhysReg(unsigned Reg,
+                                          const MCRegisterInfo *MRI) const {
+  if (const uint16_t *ImpDefs = ImplicitDefs)
+    for (; *ImpDefs; ++ImpDefs)
+      if (*ImpDefs == Reg || (MRI && MRI->isSubRegister(Reg, *ImpDefs)))
+        return true;
+  return false;
+}
+
+bool MCInstrDesc::hasDefOfPhysReg(const MCInst &MI, unsigned Reg,
+                                  const MCRegisterInfo &RI) const {
+  for (int i = 0, e = NumDefs; i != e; ++i)
+    if (MI.getOperand(i).isReg() &&
+        RI.isSubRegisterEq(Reg, MI.getOperand(i).getReg()))
+      return true;
+  return hasImplicitDefOfPhysReg(Reg, &RI);
+}