The flow-table associates TCP/UDP flows and IP destinations with

specific routes. When the routing table changes, for example,
when a new route with a more specific prefix is inserted into the
routing table, the flow-table is not updated to reflect that change.
As such existing connections cannot take advantage of the new path.
In some cases the path is broken. This patch will update the affected
flow-table entries when a more specific route is added. The route
entry is properly marked when a route is deleted from the table.
In this case, when the flow-table performs a search, the stale
entry is updated automatically. Therefore this patch is not
necessary for route deletion.

Submitted by:	simon, phk
Reviewed by:	bz, kmacy
MFC after:	3 days

1 files changed, 61 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sys/net/route.c b/sys/net/route.c
index fc76c92..1ab039f 100644
--- a/sys/net/route.c
+++ b/sys/net/route.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
 #include <net/if_dl.h>
 #include <net/route.h>
 #include <net/vnet.h>
+#include <net/flowtable.h>
 
 #ifdef RADIX_MPATH
 #include <net/radix_mpath.h>
@@ -996,6 +997,9 @@ rtrequest1_fib(int req, struct rt_addrinfo *info, struct rtentry **ret_nrt,
 {
 	int error = 0, needlock = 0;
 	register struct rtentry *rt;
+#ifdef FLOWTABLE
+	register struct rtentry *rt0;
+#endif
 	register struct radix_node *rn;
 	register struct radix_node_head *rnh;
 	struct ifaddr *ifa;
@@ -1153,6 +1157,53 @@ rtrequest1_fib(int req, struct rt_addrinfo *info, struct rtentry **ret_nrt,
 		}
 #endif
 
+#ifdef FLOWTABLE
+		rt0 = NULL;
+		/* XXX
+		 * "flow-table" only support IPv4 at the moment.
+		 */
+		if (dst->sa_family == AF_INET) {
+			rn = rnh->rnh_matchaddr(dst, rnh);
+			if (rn && ((rn->rn_flags & RNF_ROOT) == 0)) {
+				struct sockaddr *mask;
+				u_char *m, *n;
+				int len;
+				
+				/*
+				 * compare mask to see if the new route is
+				 * more specific than the existing one
+				 */
+				rt0 = RNTORT(rn);
+				RT_LOCK(rt0);
+				RT_ADDREF(rt0);
+				RT_UNLOCK(rt0);
+				/*
+				 * A host route is already present, so 
+				 * leave the flow-table entries as is.
+				 */
+				if (rt0->rt_flags & RTF_HOST) {
+					RTFREE(rt0);
+					rt0 = NULL;
+				} else if (!(flags & RTF_HOST) && netmask) {
+					mask = rt_mask(rt0);
+					len = mask->sa_len;
+					m = (u_char *)mask;
+					n = (u_char *)netmask;
+					while (len-- > 0) {
+						if (*n != *m)
+							break;
+						n++;
+						m++;
+					}
+					if (len == 0 || (*n < *m)) {
+						RTFREE(rt0);
+						rt0 = NULL;
+					}
+				}
+			}
+		}
+#endif
+
 		/* XXX mtu manipulation will be done in rnh_addaddr -- itojun */
 		rn = rnh->rnh_addaddr(ndst, netmask, rnh, rt->rt_nodes);
 		/*
@@ -1165,8 +1216,18 @@ rtrequest1_fib(int req, struct rt_addrinfo *info, struct rtentry **ret_nrt,
 			Free(rt_key(rt));
 			RT_LOCK_DESTROY(rt);
 			uma_zfree(V_rtzone, rt);
+#ifdef FLOWTABLE
+			if (rt0 != NULL)
+				RTFREE(rt0);
+#endif
 			senderr(EEXIST);
+		} 
+#ifdef FLOWTABLE
+		else if (rt0 != NULL) {
+			flowtable_route_flush(V_ip_ft, rt0);
+			RTFREE(rt0);
 		}
+#endif
 
 		/*
 		 * If this protocol has something to add to this then