diff options
author | luigi <luigi@FreeBSD.org> | 2002-02-15 08:34:33 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | luigi <luigi@FreeBSD.org> | 2002-02-15 08:34:33 +0000 |
commit | 67258c8655b2836448859873cf7dec774e9b8d92 (patch) | |
tree | 14315f18330cd5c75c75cb17aae88dd6c5654589 /share | |
parent | 43231742529f1e471666d17109045f321bbf9d14 (diff) | |
download | FreeBSD-src-67258c8655b2836448859873cf7dec774e9b8d92.zip FreeBSD-src-67258c8655b2836448859873cf7dec774e9b8d92.tar.gz |
Add a manpage for DEVICE_POLLING
Diffstat (limited to 'share')
-rw-r--r-- | share/man/man4/polling.4 | 91 |
1 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/share/man/man4/polling.4 b/share/man/man4/polling.4 new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5b5da5c --- /dev/null +++ b/share/man/man4/polling.4 @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +.\" +.\" $FreeBSD$ +.\" +.Dd February 15, 2002 +.Dt POLLING 4 +.Os +.Sh NAME +.Nm polling +.Nd device polling support +.Sh SYNOPSIS +.Cd options DEVICE_POLLING +.Cd options HZ=1000 +.Sh DESCRIPTION +"Device polling" (polling for brevity) refers to a technique to +handle devices that does not rely on the latter to generate +interrupts when they need attention, but rather lets the CPU poll +devices to service their needs. +This might seem inefficient and counterintuitive, but when done +properly, polling gives more control to the operating system on +when and how to handle devices, with a number of advantages in terms +of system responsivity and performance. +.Pp +In particular, polling reduces the overhead for context +switches which is incurred when servicing interrupts, and +gives more control on the scheduling of the CPU between various +tasks (user processes, software interrupts, device handling) +which ultimately reduces the chances of livelock in the system. + +.Sh PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION + +In the normal, interrupt-based mode, devices generate an interrupt +whenever they need attention. This in turn causes a +context switch and the execution of a interrupt handler +which performs whatever processing is needed by the device. +The duration of the interrupt handler is potentially unbounded +unless the device driver has been programmed with real-time +concerns in mind (which is generally not the case for FreeBSD +drivers). Furthermore, under heavy traffic, the system might be +persistently processing interrupts without being able to +complete other work, either in the kernel or in userland. +.Pp +Polling disables interrupts by polling devices at appropriate +times, i.e. on clock interrupts, system calls and within the idle loop. +This way, the context switch overhead is removed. Furthermore, +the operating system can control accurately how much work to spend +in handling device events, and thus prevent livelock by reserving +some amount of CPU to other tasks. +.Pp +Polling is enabled with a sysctl variable +.Va kern.polling.enable +whereas the percentage of CPU cycles reserved to userland processes is +controlled by the sysctl variable +.Va kern.polling.user_frac +whose range is 0 to 100 (50 is the default value). +.Pp +When polling is enabled, and provided that there is work to do, +up to +.Va user_frac +percent of the CPU cycles is reserved to userland tasks, the +remaining fraction being available for device processing. +.Pp +Enabling polling also changes the way network software interrupts +are scheduled, so there is never the risk of livelock because +packets are not processed to completion. +.Pp +There are other variables which control or monitor the behaviour +of devices operating in polling mode, but they are unlikely to +require modifications, and are documented in the source file +.Nm src/sys/kern/kern_poll.c +.Sh SUPPORTED DEVICES + +Polling requires explicit modifications to the device drivers. +As of this writing, the +.Li "dc", "fxp" +and +.Li "sis" +devices are supported, with other in the works. +The modifications are rather straightforward, consisting in +the extraction of the inner part of the interrupt service routine +and writing a callback function, *_poll(), which is invoked +to probe the device for events and process them. See the +conditionally compiled sections of the devices mentioned above +for more details. +.Pp +Because in the worst case devices are only polled on +clock interrupts, in order to reduce the latency in processing +packets it is advisable to increase the frequencly of the clock +to at least 1000 HZ. +.Sh HISTORY +Device polling was introduced in February 2002 by +.An Luigi Rizzo Aq luigi@iet.unipi.it . |