Removed whitespace at end-of-line; no content changes. I simply did

cd src/share; find man[1-9] -type f|xargs perl -pi -e 's/[ \t]+$//'

BTW, what editors are the culprits? I'm using vim and it shows
me whitespace at EOL in troff files with a thick blue block...

Reviewed by:	Silence from cvs diff -b
MFC after:	7 days

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/share/man/man9/intro.9 b/share/man/man9/intro.9
index 27ad145..0d927e9 100644
--- a/share/man/man9/intro.9
+++ b/share/man/man9/intro.9
@@ -45,11 +45,11 @@ Yes please.
 .Pp
 We would like all code to be fully prototyped.
 .Pp
-If your code compiles cleanly with 
+If your code compiles cleanly with
 .Nm cc
-.Ar -Wall 
+.Ar -Wall
 we would feel happy about it.
-It is important to understand that this isn't a question of just shutting up 
+It is important to understand that this isn't a question of just shutting up
 .Nm cc ,
 it is a question about avoiding the things it complains about.
 To put it bluntly, don't hide the problem by casting and other
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ It isn't generally applied though.
 We would appreciate if people would pay attention to it, and at least not
 violate it blatantly.
 .Pp
-We don't mind it too badly if you have your own style, but please make 
+We don't mind it too badly if you have your own style, but please make
 sure we can read it too.
 .Pp
 Please take time to read
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Please take time to read
 for more information.
 .Sh NAMING THINGS
 Some general rules exist:
-.Bl -enum 
+.Bl -enum
 .It
 If a function is meant as a debugging aid in DDB, it should be enclosed
 in
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ in
 .Ed
 .Pp
 And the name of the procedure should start with the prefix
-.Li DDB_ 
+.Li DDB_
 to clearly identify the procedure as a debugger routine.
 .El
 .Sh SCOPE OF SYMBOLS