Really, no explicit checks against against lock_class_* object should be

done in consumers code: using locks properties is much more appropriate.
Fix current code doing these bogus checks.

Note: Really, callout are not usable by all !(LC_SPINLOCK | LC_SLEEPABLE)
primitives like rmlocks doesn't implement the generic lock layer
functions, but they can be equipped for this, so the check is still
valid.

Tested by: matteo, kris (earlier version)
Reviewed by: jhb

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions