diff options
author | ed <ed@FreeBSD.org> | 2009-06-02 17:52:33 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | ed <ed@FreeBSD.org> | 2009-06-02 17:52:33 +0000 |
commit | 3277b69d734b9c90b44ebde4ede005717e2c3b2e (patch) | |
tree | 64ba909838c23261cace781ece27d106134ea451 /docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl6.html | |
download | FreeBSD-src-3277b69d734b9c90b44ebde4ede005717e2c3b2e.zip FreeBSD-src-3277b69d734b9c90b44ebde4ede005717e2c3b2e.tar.gz |
Import LLVM, at r72732.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl6.html')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl6.html | 1569 |
1 files changed, 1569 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl6.html b/docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl6.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..780cab8 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/tutorial/OCamlLangImpl6.html @@ -0,0 +1,1569 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> + +<html> +<head> + <title>Kaleidoscope: Extending the Language: User-defined Operators</title> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> + <meta name="author" content="Chris Lattner"> + <meta name="author" content="Erick Tryzelaar"> + <link rel="stylesheet" href="../llvm.css" type="text/css"> +</head> + +<body> + +<div class="doc_title">Kaleidoscope: Extending the Language: User-defined Operators</div> + +<ul> +<li><a href="index.html">Up to Tutorial Index</a></li> +<li>Chapter 6 + <ol> + <li><a href="#intro">Chapter 6 Introduction</a></li> + <li><a href="#idea">User-defined Operators: the Idea</a></li> + <li><a href="#binary">User-defined Binary Operators</a></li> + <li><a href="#unary">User-defined Unary Operators</a></li> + <li><a href="#example">Kicking the Tires</a></li> + <li><a href="#code">Full Code Listing</a></li> + </ol> +</li> +<li><a href="OCamlLangImpl7.html">Chapter 7</a>: Extending the Language: Mutable +Variables / SSA Construction</li> +</ul> + +<div class="doc_author"> + <p> + Written by <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a> + and <a href="mailto:idadesub@users.sourceforge.net">Erick Tryzelaar</a> + </p> +</div> + +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> +<div class="doc_section"><a name="intro">Chapter 6 Introduction</a></div> +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> + +<div class="doc_text"> + +<p>Welcome to Chapter 6 of the "<a href="index.html">Implementing a language +with LLVM</a>" tutorial. At this point in our tutorial, we now have a fully +functional language that is fairly minimal, but also useful. There +is still one big problem with it, however. Our language doesn't have many +useful operators (like division, logical negation, or even any comparisons +besides less-than).</p> + +<p>This chapter of the tutorial takes a wild digression into adding user-defined +operators to the simple and beautiful Kaleidoscope language. This digression now +gives us a simple and ugly language in some ways, but also a powerful one at the +same time. One of the great things about creating your own language is that you +get to decide what is good or bad. In this tutorial we'll assume that it is +okay to use this as a way to show some interesting parsing techniques.</p> + +<p>At the end of this tutorial, we'll run through an example Kaleidoscope +application that <a href="#example">renders the Mandelbrot set</a>. This gives +an example of what you can build with Kaleidoscope and its feature set.</p> + +</div> + +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> +<div class="doc_section"><a name="idea">User-defined Operators: the Idea</a></div> +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> + +<div class="doc_text"> + +<p> +The "operator overloading" that we will add to Kaleidoscope is more general than +languages like C++. In C++, you are only allowed to redefine existing +operators: you can't programatically change the grammar, introduce new +operators, change precedence levels, etc. In this chapter, we will add this +capability to Kaleidoscope, which will let the user round out the set of +operators that are supported.</p> + +<p>The point of going into user-defined operators in a tutorial like this is to +show the power and flexibility of using a hand-written parser. Thus far, the parser +we have been implementing uses recursive descent for most parts of the grammar and +operator precedence parsing for the expressions. See <a +href="OCamlLangImpl2.html">Chapter 2</a> for details. Without using operator +precedence parsing, it would be very difficult to allow the programmer to +introduce new operators into the grammar: the grammar is dynamically extensible +as the JIT runs.</p> + +<p>The two specific features we'll add are programmable unary operators (right +now, Kaleidoscope has no unary operators at all) as well as binary operators. +An example of this is:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +# Logical unary not. +def unary!(v) + if v then + 0 + else + 1; + +# Define > with the same precedence as <. +def binary> 10 (LHS RHS) + RHS < LHS; + +# Binary "logical or", (note that it does not "short circuit") +def binary| 5 (LHS RHS) + if LHS then + 1 + else if RHS then + 1 + else + 0; + +# Define = with slightly lower precedence than relationals. +def binary= 9 (LHS RHS) + !(LHS < RHS | LHS > RHS); +</pre> +</div> + +<p>Many languages aspire to being able to implement their standard runtime +library in the language itself. In Kaleidoscope, we can implement significant +parts of the language in the library!</p> + +<p>We will break down implementation of these features into two parts: +implementing support for user-defined binary operators and adding unary +operators.</p> + +</div> + +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> +<div class="doc_section"><a name="binary">User-defined Binary Operators</a></div> +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> + +<div class="doc_text"> + +<p>Adding support for user-defined binary operators is pretty simple with our +current framework. We'll first add support for the unary/binary keywords:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +type token = + ... + <b>(* operators *) + | Binary | Unary</b> + +... + +and lex_ident buffer = parser + ... + | "for" -> [< 'Token.For; stream >] + | "in" -> [< 'Token.In; stream >] + <b>| "binary" -> [< 'Token.Binary; stream >] + | "unary" -> [< 'Token.Unary; stream >]</b> +</pre> +</div> + +<p>This just adds lexer support for the unary and binary keywords, like we +did in <a href="OCamlLangImpl5.html#iflexer">previous chapters</a>. One nice +thing about our current AST, is that we represent binary operators with full +generalisation by using their ASCII code as the opcode. For our extended +operators, we'll use this same representation, so we don't need any new AST or +parser support.</p> + +<p>On the other hand, we have to be able to represent the definitions of these +new operators, in the "def binary| 5" part of the function definition. In our +grammar so far, the "name" for the function definition is parsed as the +"prototype" production and into the <tt>Ast.Prototype</tt> AST node. To +represent our new user-defined operators as prototypes, we have to extend +the <tt>Ast.Prototype</tt> AST node like this:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(* proto - This type represents the "prototype" for a function, which captures + * its name, and its argument names (thus implicitly the number of arguments the + * function takes). *) +type proto = + | Prototype of string * string array + <b>| BinOpPrototype of string * string array * int</b> +</pre> +</div> + +<p>Basically, in addition to knowing a name for the prototype, we now keep track +of whether it was an operator, and if it was, what precedence level the operator +is at. The precedence is only used for binary operators (as you'll see below, +it just doesn't apply for unary operators). Now that we have a way to represent +the prototype for a user-defined operator, we need to parse it:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(* prototype + * ::= id '(' id* ')' + <b>* ::= binary LETTER number? (id, id) + * ::= unary LETTER number? (id) *)</b> +let parse_prototype = + let rec parse_args accumulator = parser + | [< 'Token.Ident id; e=parse_args (id::accumulator) >] -> e + | [< >] -> accumulator + in + let parse_operator = parser + | [< 'Token.Unary >] -> "unary", 1 + | [< 'Token.Binary >] -> "binary", 2 + in + let parse_binary_precedence = parser + | [< 'Token.Number n >] -> int_of_float n + | [< >] -> 30 + in + parser + | [< 'Token.Ident id; + 'Token.Kwd '(' ?? "expected '(' in prototype"; + args=parse_args []; + 'Token.Kwd ')' ?? "expected ')' in prototype" >] -> + (* success. *) + Ast.Prototype (id, Array.of_list (List.rev args)) + <b>| [< (prefix, kind)=parse_operator; + 'Token.Kwd op ?? "expected an operator"; + (* Read the precedence if present. *) + binary_precedence=parse_binary_precedence; + 'Token.Kwd '(' ?? "expected '(' in prototype"; + args=parse_args []; + 'Token.Kwd ')' ?? "expected ')' in prototype" >] -> + let name = prefix ^ (String.make 1 op) in + let args = Array.of_list (List.rev args) in + + (* Verify right number of arguments for operator. *) + if Array.length args != kind + then raise (Stream.Error "invalid number of operands for operator") + else + if kind == 1 then + Ast.Prototype (name, args) + else + Ast.BinOpPrototype (name, args, binary_precedence)</b> + | [< >] -> + raise (Stream.Error "expected function name in prototype") +</pre> +</div> + +<p>This is all fairly straightforward parsing code, and we have already seen +a lot of similar code in the past. One interesting part about the code above is +the couple lines that set up <tt>name</tt> for binary operators. This builds +names like "binary@" for a newly defined "@" operator. This then takes +advantage of the fact that symbol names in the LLVM symbol table are allowed to +have any character in them, including embedded nul characters.</p> + +<p>The next interesting thing to add, is codegen support for these binary +operators. Given our current structure, this is a simple addition of a default +case for our existing binary operator node:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +let codegen_expr = function + ... + | Ast.Binary (op, lhs, rhs) -> + let lhs_val = codegen_expr lhs in + let rhs_val = codegen_expr rhs in + begin + match op with + | '+' -> build_add lhs_val rhs_val "addtmp" builder + | '-' -> build_sub lhs_val rhs_val "subtmp" builder + | '*' -> build_mul lhs_val rhs_val "multmp" builder + | '<' -> + (* Convert bool 0/1 to double 0.0 or 1.0 *) + let i = build_fcmp Fcmp.Ult lhs_val rhs_val "cmptmp" builder in + build_uitofp i double_type "booltmp" builder + <b>| _ -> + (* If it wasn't a builtin binary operator, it must be a user defined + * one. Emit a call to it. *) + let callee = "binary" ^ (String.make 1 op) in + let callee = + match lookup_function callee the_module with + | Some callee -> callee + | None -> raise (Error "binary operator not found!") + in + build_call callee [|lhs_val; rhs_val|] "binop" builder</b> + end +</pre> +</div> + +<p>As you can see above, the new code is actually really simple. It just does +a lookup for the appropriate operator in the symbol table and generates a +function call to it. Since user-defined operators are just built as normal +functions (because the "prototype" boils down to a function with the right +name) everything falls into place.</p> + +<p>The final piece of code we are missing, is a bit of top level magic:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +let codegen_func the_fpm = function + | Ast.Function (proto, body) -> + Hashtbl.clear named_values; + let the_function = codegen_proto proto in + + <b>(* If this is an operator, install it. *) + begin match proto with + | Ast.BinOpPrototype (name, args, prec) -> + let op = name.[String.length name - 1] in + Hashtbl.add Parser.binop_precedence op prec; + | _ -> () + end;</b> + + (* Create a new basic block to start insertion into. *) + let bb = append_block "entry" the_function in + position_at_end bb builder; + ... +</pre> +</div> + +<p>Basically, before codegening a function, if it is a user-defined operator, we +register it in the precedence table. This allows the binary operator parsing +logic we already have in place to handle it. Since we are working on a +fully-general operator precedence parser, this is all we need to do to "extend +the grammar".</p> + +<p>Now we have useful user-defined binary operators. This builds a lot +on the previous framework we built for other operators. Adding unary operators +is a bit more challenging, because we don't have any framework for it yet - lets +see what it takes.</p> + +</div> + +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> +<div class="doc_section"><a name="unary">User-defined Unary Operators</a></div> +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> + +<div class="doc_text"> + +<p>Since we don't currently support unary operators in the Kaleidoscope +language, we'll need to add everything to support them. Above, we added simple +support for the 'unary' keyword to the lexer. In addition to that, we need an +AST node:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +type expr = + ... + (* variant for a unary operator. *) + | Unary of char * expr + ... +</pre> +</div> + +<p>This AST node is very simple and obvious by now. It directly mirrors the +binary operator AST node, except that it only has one child. With this, we +need to add the parsing logic. Parsing a unary operator is pretty simple: we'll +add a new function to do it:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(* unary + * ::= primary + * ::= '!' unary *) +and parse_unary = parser + (* If this is a unary operator, read it. *) + | [< 'Token.Kwd op when op != '(' && op != ')'; operand=parse_expr >] -> + Ast.Unary (op, operand) + + (* If the current token is not an operator, it must be a primary expr. *) + | [< stream >] -> parse_primary stream +</pre> +</div> + +<p>The grammar we add is pretty straightforward here. If we see a unary +operator when parsing a primary operator, we eat the operator as a prefix and +parse the remaining piece as another unary operator. This allows us to handle +multiple unary operators (e.g. "!!x"). Note that unary operators can't have +ambiguous parses like binary operators can, so there is no need for precedence +information.</p> + +<p>The problem with this function, is that we need to call ParseUnary from +somewhere. To do this, we change previous callers of ParsePrimary to call +<tt>parse_unary</tt> instead:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(* binoprhs + * ::= ('+' primary)* *) +and parse_bin_rhs expr_prec lhs stream = + ... + <b>(* Parse the unary expression after the binary operator. *) + let rhs = parse_unary stream in</b> + ... + +... + +(* expression + * ::= primary binoprhs *) +and parse_expr = parser + | [< lhs=<b>parse_unary</b>; stream >] -> parse_bin_rhs 0 lhs stream +</pre> +</div> + +<p>With these two simple changes, we are now able to parse unary operators and build the +AST for them. Next up, we need to add parser support for prototypes, to parse +the unary operator prototype. We extend the binary operator code above +with:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(* prototype + * ::= id '(' id* ')' + * ::= binary LETTER number? (id, id) + <b>* ::= unary LETTER number? (id)</b> *) +let parse_prototype = + let rec parse_args accumulator = parser + | [< 'Token.Ident id; e=parse_args (id::accumulator) >] -> e + | [< >] -> accumulator + in + <b>let parse_operator = parser + | [< 'Token.Unary >] -> "unary", 1 + | [< 'Token.Binary >] -> "binary", 2 + in</b> + let parse_binary_precedence = parser + | [< 'Token.Number n >] -> int_of_float n + | [< >] -> 30 + in + parser + | [< 'Token.Ident id; + 'Token.Kwd '(' ?? "expected '(' in prototype"; + args=parse_args []; + 'Token.Kwd ')' ?? "expected ')' in prototype" >] -> + (* success. *) + Ast.Prototype (id, Array.of_list (List.rev args)) + <b>| [< (prefix, kind)=parse_operator; + 'Token.Kwd op ?? "expected an operator"; + (* Read the precedence if present. *) + binary_precedence=parse_binary_precedence; + 'Token.Kwd '(' ?? "expected '(' in prototype"; + args=parse_args []; + 'Token.Kwd ')' ?? "expected ')' in prototype" >] -> + let name = prefix ^ (String.make 1 op) in + let args = Array.of_list (List.rev args) in + + (* Verify right number of arguments for operator. *) + if Array.length args != kind + then raise (Stream.Error "invalid number of operands for operator") + else + if kind == 1 then + Ast.Prototype (name, args) + else + Ast.BinOpPrototype (name, args, binary_precedence)</b> + | [< >] -> + raise (Stream.Error "expected function name in prototype") +</pre> +</div> + +<p>As with binary operators, we name unary operators with a name that includes +the operator character. This assists us at code generation time. Speaking of, +the final piece we need to add is codegen support for unary operators. It looks +like this:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +let rec codegen_expr = function + ... + | Ast.Unary (op, operand) -> + let operand = codegen_expr operand in + let callee = "unary" ^ (String.make 1 op) in + let callee = + match lookup_function callee the_module with + | Some callee -> callee + | None -> raise (Error "unknown unary operator") + in + build_call callee [|operand|] "unop" builder +</pre> +</div> + +<p>This code is similar to, but simpler than, the code for binary operators. It +is simpler primarily because it doesn't need to handle any predefined operators. +</p> + +</div> + +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> +<div class="doc_section"><a name="example">Kicking the Tires</a></div> +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> + +<div class="doc_text"> + +<p>It is somewhat hard to believe, but with a few simple extensions we've +covered in the last chapters, we have grown a real-ish language. With this, we +can do a lot of interesting things, including I/O, math, and a bunch of other +things. For example, we can now add a nice sequencing operator (printd is +defined to print out the specified value and a newline):</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +ready> <b>extern printd(x);</b> +Read extern: declare double @printd(double) +ready> <b>def binary : 1 (x y) 0; # Low-precedence operator that ignores operands.</b> +.. +ready> <b>printd(123) : printd(456) : printd(789);</b> +123.000000 +456.000000 +789.000000 +Evaluated to 0.000000 +</pre> +</div> + +<p>We can also define a bunch of other "primitive" operations, such as:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +# Logical unary not. +def unary!(v) + if v then + 0 + else + 1; + +# Unary negate. +def unary-(v) + 0-v; + +# Define > with the same precedence as >. +def binary> 10 (LHS RHS) + RHS < LHS; + +# Binary logical or, which does not short circuit. +def binary| 5 (LHS RHS) + if LHS then + 1 + else if RHS then + 1 + else + 0; + +# Binary logical and, which does not short circuit. +def binary& 6 (LHS RHS) + if !LHS then + 0 + else + !!RHS; + +# Define = with slightly lower precedence than relationals. +def binary = 9 (LHS RHS) + !(LHS < RHS | LHS > RHS); + +</pre> +</div> + + +<p>Given the previous if/then/else support, we can also define interesting +functions for I/O. For example, the following prints out a character whose +"density" reflects the value passed in: the lower the value, the denser the +character:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +ready> +<b> +extern putchard(char) +def printdensity(d) + if d > 8 then + putchard(32) # ' ' + else if d > 4 then + putchard(46) # '.' + else if d > 2 then + putchard(43) # '+' + else + putchard(42); # '*'</b> +... +ready> <b>printdensity(1): printdensity(2): printdensity(3) : + printdensity(4): printdensity(5): printdensity(9): putchard(10);</b> +*++.. +Evaluated to 0.000000 +</pre> +</div> + +<p>Based on these simple primitive operations, we can start to define more +interesting things. For example, here's a little function that solves for the +number of iterations it takes a function in the complex plane to +converge:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +# determine whether the specific location diverges. +# Solve for z = z^2 + c in the complex plane. +def mandleconverger(real imag iters creal cimag) + if iters > 255 | (real*real + imag*imag > 4) then + iters + else + mandleconverger(real*real - imag*imag + creal, + 2*real*imag + cimag, + iters+1, creal, cimag); + +# return the number of iterations required for the iteration to escape +def mandleconverge(real imag) + mandleconverger(real, imag, 0, real, imag); +</pre> +</div> + +<p>This "z = z<sup>2</sup> + c" function is a beautiful little creature that is the basis +for computation of the <a +href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set">Mandelbrot Set</a>. Our +<tt>mandelconverge</tt> function returns the number of iterations that it takes +for a complex orbit to escape, saturating to 255. This is not a very useful +function by itself, but if you plot its value over a two-dimensional plane, +you can see the Mandelbrot set. Given that we are limited to using putchard +here, our amazing graphical output is limited, but we can whip together +something using the density plotter above:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +# compute and plot the mandlebrot set with the specified 2 dimensional range +# info. +def mandelhelp(xmin xmax xstep ymin ymax ystep) + for y = ymin, y < ymax, ystep in ( + (for x = xmin, x < xmax, xstep in + printdensity(mandleconverge(x,y))) + : putchard(10) + ) + +# mandel - This is a convenient helper function for ploting the mandelbrot set +# from the specified position with the specified Magnification. +def mandel(realstart imagstart realmag imagmag) + mandelhelp(realstart, realstart+realmag*78, realmag, + imagstart, imagstart+imagmag*40, imagmag); +</pre> +</div> + +<p>Given this, we can try plotting out the mandlebrot set! Lets try it out:</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +ready> <b>mandel(-2.3, -1.3, 0.05, 0.07);</b> +*******************************+++++++++++************************************* +*************************+++++++++++++++++++++++******************************* +**********************+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++**************************** +*******************+++++++++++++++++++++.. ...++++++++************************* +*****************++++++++++++++++++++++.... ...+++++++++*********************** +***************+++++++++++++++++++++++..... ...+++++++++********************* +**************+++++++++++++++++++++++.... ....+++++++++******************** +*************++++++++++++++++++++++...... .....++++++++******************* +************+++++++++++++++++++++....... .......+++++++****************** +***********+++++++++++++++++++.... ... .+++++++***************** +**********+++++++++++++++++....... .+++++++**************** +*********++++++++++++++........... ...+++++++*************** +********++++++++++++............ ...++++++++************** +********++++++++++... .......... .++++++++************** +*******+++++++++..... .+++++++++************* +*******++++++++...... ..+++++++++************* +*******++++++....... ..+++++++++************* +*******+++++...... ..+++++++++************* +*******.... .... ...+++++++++************* +*******.... . ...+++++++++************* +*******+++++...... ...+++++++++************* +*******++++++....... ..+++++++++************* +*******++++++++...... .+++++++++************* +*******+++++++++..... ..+++++++++************* +********++++++++++... .......... .++++++++************** +********++++++++++++............ ...++++++++************** +*********++++++++++++++.......... ...+++++++*************** +**********++++++++++++++++........ .+++++++**************** +**********++++++++++++++++++++.... ... ..+++++++**************** +***********++++++++++++++++++++++....... .......++++++++***************** +************+++++++++++++++++++++++...... ......++++++++****************** +**************+++++++++++++++++++++++.... ....++++++++******************** +***************+++++++++++++++++++++++..... ...+++++++++********************* +*****************++++++++++++++++++++++.... ...++++++++*********************** +*******************+++++++++++++++++++++......++++++++************************* +*********************++++++++++++++++++++++.++++++++*************************** +*************************+++++++++++++++++++++++******************************* +******************************+++++++++++++************************************ +******************************************************************************* +******************************************************************************* +******************************************************************************* +Evaluated to 0.000000 +ready> <b>mandel(-2, -1, 0.02, 0.04);</b> +**************************+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +***********************++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +*********************+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. +*******************+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++... +*****************+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++..... +***************++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++........ +**************++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++........... +************+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.............. +***********++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++........ . +**********++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++............. +********+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.................. +*******+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++....................... +******+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++........................... +*****++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++............................ +*****++++++++++++++++++++++++++++............................... +****++++++++++++++++++++++++++...... ......................... +***++++++++++++++++++++++++......... ...... ........... +***++++++++++++++++++++++............ +**+++++++++++++++++++++.............. +**+++++++++++++++++++................ +*++++++++++++++++++................. +*++++++++++++++++............ ... +*++++++++++++++.............. +*+++....++++................ +*.......... ........... +* +*.......... ........... +*+++....++++................ +*++++++++++++++.............. +*++++++++++++++++............ ... +*++++++++++++++++++................. +**+++++++++++++++++++................ +**+++++++++++++++++++++.............. +***++++++++++++++++++++++............ +***++++++++++++++++++++++++......... ...... ........... +****++++++++++++++++++++++++++...... ......................... +*****++++++++++++++++++++++++++++............................... +*****++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++............................ +******+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++........................... +*******+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++....................... +********+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.................. +Evaluated to 0.000000 +ready> <b>mandel(-0.9, -1.4, 0.02, 0.03);</b> +******************************************************************************* +******************************************************************************* +******************************************************************************* +**********+++++++++++++++++++++************************************************ +*+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++*************************************** ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++********************************** +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++***************************** +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++************************* ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++********************** ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.........++++++++++++++++++******************* ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.... ......+++++++++++++++++++**************** ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++....... ........+++++++++++++++++++************** +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++........ ........++++++++++++++++++++************ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++......... .. ...+++++++++++++++++++++********** +++++++++++++++++++++++++++........... ....++++++++++++++++++++++******** +++++++++++++++++++++++++............. .......++++++++++++++++++++++****** ++++++++++++++++++++++++............. ........+++++++++++++++++++++++**** +++++++++++++++++++++++........... ..........++++++++++++++++++++++*** +++++++++++++++++++++........... .........++++++++++++++++++++++* +++++++++++++++++++............ ...........++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++............... .............++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++................. ...............++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++.................. .................++++++++++++++ ++++++++++.................. .................+++++++++++++ +++++++........ . ......... ..++++++++++++ +++............ ...... ....++++++++++ +.............. ...++++++++++ +.............. ....+++++++++ +.............. .....++++++++ +............. ......++++++++ +........... .......++++++++ +......... ........+++++++ +......... ........+++++++ +......... ....+++++++ +........ ...+++++++ +....... ...+++++++ + ....+++++++ + .....+++++++ + ....+++++++ + ....+++++++ + ....+++++++ +Evaluated to 0.000000 +ready> <b>^D</b> +</pre> +</div> + +<p>At this point, you may be starting to realize that Kaleidoscope is a real +and powerful language. It may not be self-similar :), but it can be used to +plot things that are!</p> + +<p>With this, we conclude the "adding user-defined operators" chapter of the +tutorial. We have successfully augmented our language, adding the ability to +extend the language in the library, and we have shown how this can be used to +build a simple but interesting end-user application in Kaleidoscope. At this +point, Kaleidoscope can build a variety of applications that are functional and +can call functions with side-effects, but it can't actually define and mutate a +variable itself.</p> + +<p>Strikingly, variable mutation is an important feature of some +languages, and it is not at all obvious how to <a href="OCamlLangImpl7.html">add +support for mutable variables</a> without having to add an "SSA construction" +phase to your front-end. In the next chapter, we will describe how you can +add variable mutation without building SSA in your front-end.</p> + +</div> + + +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> +<div class="doc_section"><a name="code">Full Code Listing</a></div> +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> + +<div class="doc_text"> + +<p> +Here is the complete code listing for our running example, enhanced with the +if/then/else and for expressions.. To build this example, use: +</p> + +<div class="doc_code"> +<pre> +# Compile +ocamlbuild toy.byte +# Run +./toy.byte +</pre> +</div> + +<p>Here is the code:</p> + +<dl> +<dt>_tags:</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +<{lexer,parser}.ml>: use_camlp4, pp(camlp4of) +<*.{byte,native}>: g++, use_llvm, use_llvm_analysis +<*.{byte,native}>: use_llvm_executionengine, use_llvm_target +<*.{byte,native}>: use_llvm_scalar_opts, use_bindings +</pre> +</dd> + +<dt>myocamlbuild.ml:</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +open Ocamlbuild_plugin;; + +ocaml_lib ~extern:true "llvm";; +ocaml_lib ~extern:true "llvm_analysis";; +ocaml_lib ~extern:true "llvm_executionengine";; +ocaml_lib ~extern:true "llvm_target";; +ocaml_lib ~extern:true "llvm_scalar_opts";; + +flag ["link"; "ocaml"; "g++"] (S[A"-cc"; A"g++"]);; +dep ["link"; "ocaml"; "use_bindings"] ["bindings.o"];; +</pre> +</dd> + +<dt>token.ml:</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(*===----------------------------------------------------------------------=== + * Lexer Tokens + *===----------------------------------------------------------------------===*) + +(* The lexer returns these 'Kwd' if it is an unknown character, otherwise one of + * these others for known things. *) +type token = + (* commands *) + | Def | Extern + + (* primary *) + | Ident of string | Number of float + + (* unknown *) + | Kwd of char + + (* control *) + | If | Then | Else + | For | In + + (* operators *) + | Binary | Unary +</pre> +</dd> + +<dt>lexer.ml:</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(*===----------------------------------------------------------------------=== + * Lexer + *===----------------------------------------------------------------------===*) + +let rec lex = parser + (* Skip any whitespace. *) + | [< ' (' ' | '\n' | '\r' | '\t'); stream >] -> lex stream + + (* identifier: [a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9] *) + | [< ' ('A' .. 'Z' | 'a' .. 'z' as c); stream >] -> + let buffer = Buffer.create 1 in + Buffer.add_char buffer c; + lex_ident buffer stream + + (* number: [0-9.]+ *) + | [< ' ('0' .. '9' as c); stream >] -> + let buffer = Buffer.create 1 in + Buffer.add_char buffer c; + lex_number buffer stream + + (* Comment until end of line. *) + | [< ' ('#'); stream >] -> + lex_comment stream + + (* Otherwise, just return the character as its ascii value. *) + | [< 'c; stream >] -> + [< 'Token.Kwd c; lex stream >] + + (* end of stream. *) + | [< >] -> [< >] + +and lex_number buffer = parser + | [< ' ('0' .. '9' | '.' as c); stream >] -> + Buffer.add_char buffer c; + lex_number buffer stream + | [< stream=lex >] -> + [< 'Token.Number (float_of_string (Buffer.contents buffer)); stream >] + +and lex_ident buffer = parser + | [< ' ('A' .. 'Z' | 'a' .. 'z' | '0' .. '9' as c); stream >] -> + Buffer.add_char buffer c; + lex_ident buffer stream + | [< stream=lex >] -> + match Buffer.contents buffer with + | "def" -> [< 'Token.Def; stream >] + | "extern" -> [< 'Token.Extern; stream >] + | "if" -> [< 'Token.If; stream >] + | "then" -> [< 'Token.Then; stream >] + | "else" -> [< 'Token.Else; stream >] + | "for" -> [< 'Token.For; stream >] + | "in" -> [< 'Token.In; stream >] + | "binary" -> [< 'Token.Binary; stream >] + | "unary" -> [< 'Token.Unary; stream >] + | id -> [< 'Token.Ident id; stream >] + +and lex_comment = parser + | [< ' ('\n'); stream=lex >] -> stream + | [< 'c; e=lex_comment >] -> e + | [< >] -> [< >] +</pre> +</dd> + +<dt>ast.ml:</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(*===----------------------------------------------------------------------=== + * Abstract Syntax Tree (aka Parse Tree) + *===----------------------------------------------------------------------===*) + +(* expr - Base type for all expression nodes. *) +type expr = + (* variant for numeric literals like "1.0". *) + | Number of float + + (* variant for referencing a variable, like "a". *) + | Variable of string + + (* variant for a unary operator. *) + | Unary of char * expr + + (* variant for a binary operator. *) + | Binary of char * expr * expr + + (* variant for function calls. *) + | Call of string * expr array + + (* variant for if/then/else. *) + | If of expr * expr * expr + + (* variant for for/in. *) + | For of string * expr * expr * expr option * expr + +(* proto - This type represents the "prototype" for a function, which captures + * its name, and its argument names (thus implicitly the number of arguments the + * function takes). *) +type proto = + | Prototype of string * string array + | BinOpPrototype of string * string array * int + +(* func - This type represents a function definition itself. *) +type func = Function of proto * expr +</pre> +</dd> + +<dt>parser.ml:</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(*===---------------------------------------------------------------------=== + * Parser + *===---------------------------------------------------------------------===*) + +(* binop_precedence - This holds the precedence for each binary operator that is + * defined *) +let binop_precedence:(char, int) Hashtbl.t = Hashtbl.create 10 + +(* precedence - Get the precedence of the pending binary operator token. *) +let precedence c = try Hashtbl.find binop_precedence c with Not_found -> -1 + +(* primary + * ::= identifier + * ::= numberexpr + * ::= parenexpr + * ::= ifexpr + * ::= forexpr *) +let rec parse_primary = parser + (* numberexpr ::= number *) + | [< 'Token.Number n >] -> Ast.Number n + + (* parenexpr ::= '(' expression ')' *) + | [< 'Token.Kwd '('; e=parse_expr; 'Token.Kwd ')' ?? "expected ')'" >] -> e + + (* identifierexpr + * ::= identifier + * ::= identifier '(' argumentexpr ')' *) + | [< 'Token.Ident id; stream >] -> + let rec parse_args accumulator = parser + | [< e=parse_expr; stream >] -> + begin parser + | [< 'Token.Kwd ','; e=parse_args (e :: accumulator) >] -> e + | [< >] -> e :: accumulator + end stream + | [< >] -> accumulator + in + let rec parse_ident id = parser + (* Call. *) + | [< 'Token.Kwd '('; + args=parse_args []; + 'Token.Kwd ')' ?? "expected ')'">] -> + Ast.Call (id, Array.of_list (List.rev args)) + + (* Simple variable ref. *) + | [< >] -> Ast.Variable id + in + parse_ident id stream + + (* ifexpr ::= 'if' expr 'then' expr 'else' expr *) + | [< 'Token.If; c=parse_expr; + 'Token.Then ?? "expected 'then'"; t=parse_expr; + 'Token.Else ?? "expected 'else'"; e=parse_expr >] -> + Ast.If (c, t, e) + + (* forexpr + ::= 'for' identifier '=' expr ',' expr (',' expr)? 'in' expression *) + | [< 'Token.For; + 'Token.Ident id ?? "expected identifier after for"; + 'Token.Kwd '=' ?? "expected '=' after for"; + stream >] -> + begin parser + | [< + start=parse_expr; + 'Token.Kwd ',' ?? "expected ',' after for"; + end_=parse_expr; + stream >] -> + let step = + begin parser + | [< 'Token.Kwd ','; step=parse_expr >] -> Some step + | [< >] -> None + end stream + in + begin parser + | [< 'Token.In; body=parse_expr >] -> + Ast.For (id, start, end_, step, body) + | [< >] -> + raise (Stream.Error "expected 'in' after for") + end stream + | [< >] -> + raise (Stream.Error "expected '=' after for") + end stream + + | [< >] -> raise (Stream.Error "unknown token when expecting an expression.") + +(* unary + * ::= primary + * ::= '!' unary *) +and parse_unary = parser + (* If this is a unary operator, read it. *) + | [< 'Token.Kwd op when op != '(' && op != ')'; operand=parse_expr >] -> + Ast.Unary (op, operand) + + (* If the current token is not an operator, it must be a primary expr. *) + | [< stream >] -> parse_primary stream + +(* binoprhs + * ::= ('+' primary)* *) +and parse_bin_rhs expr_prec lhs stream = + match Stream.peek stream with + (* If this is a binop, find its precedence. *) + | Some (Token.Kwd c) when Hashtbl.mem binop_precedence c -> + let token_prec = precedence c in + + (* If this is a binop that binds at least as tightly as the current binop, + * consume it, otherwise we are done. *) + if token_prec < expr_prec then lhs else begin + (* Eat the binop. *) + Stream.junk stream; + + (* Parse the unary expression after the binary operator. *) + let rhs = parse_unary stream in + + (* Okay, we know this is a binop. *) + let rhs = + match Stream.peek stream with + | Some (Token.Kwd c2) -> + (* If BinOp binds less tightly with rhs than the operator after + * rhs, let the pending operator take rhs as its lhs. *) + let next_prec = precedence c2 in + if token_prec < next_prec + then parse_bin_rhs (token_prec + 1) rhs stream + else rhs + | _ -> rhs + in + + (* Merge lhs/rhs. *) + let lhs = Ast.Binary (c, lhs, rhs) in + parse_bin_rhs expr_prec lhs stream + end + | _ -> lhs + +(* expression + * ::= primary binoprhs *) +and parse_expr = parser + | [< lhs=parse_unary; stream >] -> parse_bin_rhs 0 lhs stream + +(* prototype + * ::= id '(' id* ')' + * ::= binary LETTER number? (id, id) + * ::= unary LETTER number? (id) *) +let parse_prototype = + let rec parse_args accumulator = parser + | [< 'Token.Ident id; e=parse_args (id::accumulator) >] -> e + | [< >] -> accumulator + in + let parse_operator = parser + | [< 'Token.Unary >] -> "unary", 1 + | [< 'Token.Binary >] -> "binary", 2 + in + let parse_binary_precedence = parser + | [< 'Token.Number n >] -> int_of_float n + | [< >] -> 30 + in + parser + | [< 'Token.Ident id; + 'Token.Kwd '(' ?? "expected '(' in prototype"; + args=parse_args []; + 'Token.Kwd ')' ?? "expected ')' in prototype" >] -> + (* success. *) + Ast.Prototype (id, Array.of_list (List.rev args)) + | [< (prefix, kind)=parse_operator; + 'Token.Kwd op ?? "expected an operator"; + (* Read the precedence if present. *) + binary_precedence=parse_binary_precedence; + 'Token.Kwd '(' ?? "expected '(' in prototype"; + args=parse_args []; + 'Token.Kwd ')' ?? "expected ')' in prototype" >] -> + let name = prefix ^ (String.make 1 op) in + let args = Array.of_list (List.rev args) in + + (* Verify right number of arguments for operator. *) + if Array.length args != kind + then raise (Stream.Error "invalid number of operands for operator") + else + if kind == 1 then + Ast.Prototype (name, args) + else + Ast.BinOpPrototype (name, args, binary_precedence) + | [< >] -> + raise (Stream.Error "expected function name in prototype") + +(* definition ::= 'def' prototype expression *) +let parse_definition = parser + | [< 'Token.Def; p=parse_prototype; e=parse_expr >] -> + Ast.Function (p, e) + +(* toplevelexpr ::= expression *) +let parse_toplevel = parser + | [< e=parse_expr >] -> + (* Make an anonymous proto. *) + Ast.Function (Ast.Prototype ("", [||]), e) + +(* external ::= 'extern' prototype *) +let parse_extern = parser + | [< 'Token.Extern; e=parse_prototype >] -> e +</pre> +</dd> + +<dt>codegen.ml:</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(*===----------------------------------------------------------------------=== + * Code Generation + *===----------------------------------------------------------------------===*) + +open Llvm + +exception Error of string + +let the_module = create_module "my cool jit" +let builder = builder () +let named_values:(string, llvalue) Hashtbl.t = Hashtbl.create 10 + +let rec codegen_expr = function + | Ast.Number n -> const_float double_type n + | Ast.Variable name -> + (try Hashtbl.find named_values name with + | Not_found -> raise (Error "unknown variable name")) + | Ast.Unary (op, operand) -> + let operand = codegen_expr operand in + let callee = "unary" ^ (String.make 1 op) in + let callee = + match lookup_function callee the_module with + | Some callee -> callee + | None -> raise (Error "unknown unary operator") + in + build_call callee [|operand|] "unop" builder + | Ast.Binary (op, lhs, rhs) -> + let lhs_val = codegen_expr lhs in + let rhs_val = codegen_expr rhs in + begin + match op with + | '+' -> build_add lhs_val rhs_val "addtmp" builder + | '-' -> build_sub lhs_val rhs_val "subtmp" builder + | '*' -> build_mul lhs_val rhs_val "multmp" builder + | '<' -> + (* Convert bool 0/1 to double 0.0 or 1.0 *) + let i = build_fcmp Fcmp.Ult lhs_val rhs_val "cmptmp" builder in + build_uitofp i double_type "booltmp" builder + | _ -> + (* If it wasn't a builtin binary operator, it must be a user defined + * one. Emit a call to it. *) + let callee = "binary" ^ (String.make 1 op) in + let callee = + match lookup_function callee the_module with + | Some callee -> callee + | None -> raise (Error "binary operator not found!") + in + build_call callee [|lhs_val; rhs_val|] "binop" builder + end + | Ast.Call (callee, args) -> + (* Look up the name in the module table. *) + let callee = + match lookup_function callee the_module with + | Some callee -> callee + | None -> raise (Error "unknown function referenced") + in + let params = params callee in + + (* If argument mismatch error. *) + if Array.length params == Array.length args then () else + raise (Error "incorrect # arguments passed"); + let args = Array.map codegen_expr args in + build_call callee args "calltmp" builder + | Ast.If (cond, then_, else_) -> + let cond = codegen_expr cond in + + (* Convert condition to a bool by comparing equal to 0.0 *) + let zero = const_float double_type 0.0 in + let cond_val = build_fcmp Fcmp.One cond zero "ifcond" builder in + + (* Grab the first block so that we might later add the conditional branch + * to it at the end of the function. *) + let start_bb = insertion_block builder in + let the_function = block_parent start_bb in + + let then_bb = append_block "then" the_function in + + (* Emit 'then' value. *) + position_at_end then_bb builder; + let then_val = codegen_expr then_ in + + (* Codegen of 'then' can change the current block, update then_bb for the + * phi. We create a new name because one is used for the phi node, and the + * other is used for the conditional branch. *) + let new_then_bb = insertion_block builder in + + (* Emit 'else' value. *) + let else_bb = append_block "else" the_function in + position_at_end else_bb builder; + let else_val = codegen_expr else_ in + + (* Codegen of 'else' can change the current block, update else_bb for the + * phi. *) + let new_else_bb = insertion_block builder in + + (* Emit merge block. *) + let merge_bb = append_block "ifcont" the_function in + position_at_end merge_bb builder; + let incoming = [(then_val, new_then_bb); (else_val, new_else_bb)] in + let phi = build_phi incoming "iftmp" builder in + + (* Return to the start block to add the conditional branch. *) + position_at_end start_bb builder; + ignore (build_cond_br cond_val then_bb else_bb builder); + + (* Set a unconditional branch at the end of the 'then' block and the + * 'else' block to the 'merge' block. *) + position_at_end new_then_bb builder; ignore (build_br merge_bb builder); + position_at_end new_else_bb builder; ignore (build_br merge_bb builder); + + (* Finally, set the builder to the end of the merge block. *) + position_at_end merge_bb builder; + + phi + | Ast.For (var_name, start, end_, step, body) -> + (* Emit the start code first, without 'variable' in scope. *) + let start_val = codegen_expr start in + + (* Make the new basic block for the loop header, inserting after current + * block. *) + let preheader_bb = insertion_block builder in + let the_function = block_parent preheader_bb in + let loop_bb = append_block "loop" the_function in + + (* Insert an explicit fall through from the current block to the + * loop_bb. *) + ignore (build_br loop_bb builder); + + (* Start insertion in loop_bb. *) + position_at_end loop_bb builder; + + (* Start the PHI node with an entry for start. *) + let variable = build_phi [(start_val, preheader_bb)] var_name builder in + + (* Within the loop, the variable is defined equal to the PHI node. If it + * shadows an existing variable, we have to restore it, so save it + * now. *) + let old_val = + try Some (Hashtbl.find named_values var_name) with Not_found -> None + in + Hashtbl.add named_values var_name variable; + + (* Emit the body of the loop. This, like any other expr, can change the + * current BB. Note that we ignore the value computed by the body, but + * don't allow an error *) + ignore (codegen_expr body); + + (* Emit the step value. *) + let step_val = + match step with + | Some step -> codegen_expr step + (* If not specified, use 1.0. *) + | None -> const_float double_type 1.0 + in + + let next_var = build_add variable step_val "nextvar" builder in + + (* Compute the end condition. *) + let end_cond = codegen_expr end_ in + + (* Convert condition to a bool by comparing equal to 0.0. *) + let zero = const_float double_type 0.0 in + let end_cond = build_fcmp Fcmp.One end_cond zero "loopcond" builder in + + (* Create the "after loop" block and insert it. *) + let loop_end_bb = insertion_block builder in + let after_bb = append_block "afterloop" the_function in + + (* Insert the conditional branch into the end of loop_end_bb. *) + ignore (build_cond_br end_cond loop_bb after_bb builder); + + (* Any new code will be inserted in after_bb. *) + position_at_end after_bb builder; + + (* Add a new entry to the PHI node for the backedge. *) + add_incoming (next_var, loop_end_bb) variable; + + (* Restore the unshadowed variable. *) + begin match old_val with + | Some old_val -> Hashtbl.add named_values var_name old_val + | None -> () + end; + + (* for expr always returns 0.0. *) + const_null double_type + +let codegen_proto = function + | Ast.Prototype (name, args) | Ast.BinOpPrototype (name, args, _) -> + (* Make the function type: double(double,double) etc. *) + let doubles = Array.make (Array.length args) double_type in + let ft = function_type double_type doubles in + let f = + match lookup_function name the_module with + | None -> declare_function name ft the_module + + (* If 'f' conflicted, there was already something named 'name'. If it + * has a body, don't allow redefinition or reextern. *) + | Some f -> + (* If 'f' already has a body, reject this. *) + if block_begin f <> At_end f then + raise (Error "redefinition of function"); + + (* If 'f' took a different number of arguments, reject. *) + if element_type (type_of f) <> ft then + raise (Error "redefinition of function with different # args"); + f + in + + (* Set names for all arguments. *) + Array.iteri (fun i a -> + let n = args.(i) in + set_value_name n a; + Hashtbl.add named_values n a; + ) (params f); + f + +let codegen_func the_fpm = function + | Ast.Function (proto, body) -> + Hashtbl.clear named_values; + let the_function = codegen_proto proto in + + (* If this is an operator, install it. *) + begin match proto with + | Ast.BinOpPrototype (name, args, prec) -> + let op = name.[String.length name - 1] in + Hashtbl.add Parser.binop_precedence op prec; + | _ -> () + end; + + (* Create a new basic block to start insertion into. *) + let bb = append_block "entry" the_function in + position_at_end bb builder; + + try + let ret_val = codegen_expr body in + + (* Finish off the function. *) + let _ = build_ret ret_val builder in + + (* Validate the generated code, checking for consistency. *) + Llvm_analysis.assert_valid_function the_function; + + (* Optimize the function. *) + let _ = PassManager.run_function the_function the_fpm in + + the_function + with e -> + delete_function the_function; + raise e +</pre> +</dd> + +<dt>toplevel.ml:</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(*===----------------------------------------------------------------------=== + * Top-Level parsing and JIT Driver + *===----------------------------------------------------------------------===*) + +open Llvm +open Llvm_executionengine + +(* top ::= definition | external | expression | ';' *) +let rec main_loop the_fpm the_execution_engine stream = + match Stream.peek stream with + | None -> () + + (* ignore top-level semicolons. *) + | Some (Token.Kwd ';') -> + Stream.junk stream; + main_loop the_fpm the_execution_engine stream + + | Some token -> + begin + try match token with + | Token.Def -> + let e = Parser.parse_definition stream in + print_endline "parsed a function definition."; + dump_value (Codegen.codegen_func the_fpm e); + | Token.Extern -> + let e = Parser.parse_extern stream in + print_endline "parsed an extern."; + dump_value (Codegen.codegen_proto e); + | _ -> + (* Evaluate a top-level expression into an anonymous function. *) + let e = Parser.parse_toplevel stream in + print_endline "parsed a top-level expr"; + let the_function = Codegen.codegen_func the_fpm e in + dump_value the_function; + + (* JIT the function, returning a function pointer. *) + let result = ExecutionEngine.run_function the_function [||] + the_execution_engine in + + print_string "Evaluated to "; + print_float (GenericValue.as_float double_type result); + print_newline (); + with Stream.Error s | Codegen.Error s -> + (* Skip token for error recovery. *) + Stream.junk stream; + print_endline s; + end; + print_string "ready> "; flush stdout; + main_loop the_fpm the_execution_engine stream +</pre> +</dd> + +<dt>toy.ml:</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +(*===----------------------------------------------------------------------=== + * Main driver code. + *===----------------------------------------------------------------------===*) + +open Llvm +open Llvm_executionengine +open Llvm_target +open Llvm_scalar_opts + +let main () = + (* Install standard binary operators. + * 1 is the lowest precedence. *) + Hashtbl.add Parser.binop_precedence '<' 10; + Hashtbl.add Parser.binop_precedence '+' 20; + Hashtbl.add Parser.binop_precedence '-' 20; + Hashtbl.add Parser.binop_precedence '*' 40; (* highest. *) + + (* Prime the first token. *) + print_string "ready> "; flush stdout; + let stream = Lexer.lex (Stream.of_channel stdin) in + + (* Create the JIT. *) + let the_module_provider = ModuleProvider.create Codegen.the_module in + let the_execution_engine = ExecutionEngine.create the_module_provider in + let the_fpm = PassManager.create_function the_module_provider in + + (* Set up the optimizer pipeline. Start with registering info about how the + * target lays out data structures. *) + TargetData.add (ExecutionEngine.target_data the_execution_engine) the_fpm; + + (* Do simple "peephole" optimizations and bit-twiddling optzn. *) + add_instruction_combining the_fpm; + + (* reassociate expressions. *) + add_reassociation the_fpm; + + (* Eliminate Common SubExpressions. *) + add_gvn the_fpm; + + (* Simplify the control flow graph (deleting unreachable blocks, etc). *) + add_cfg_simplification the_fpm; + + (* Run the main "interpreter loop" now. *) + Toplevel.main_loop the_fpm the_execution_engine stream; + + (* Print out all the generated code. *) + dump_module Codegen.the_module +;; + +main () +</pre> +</dd> + +<dt>bindings.c</dt> +<dd class="doc_code"> +<pre> +#include <stdio.h> + +/* putchard - putchar that takes a double and returns 0. */ +extern double putchard(double X) { + putchar((char)X); + return 0; +} + +/* printd - printf that takes a double prints it as "%f\n", returning 0. */ +extern double printd(double X) { + printf("%f\n", X); + return 0; +} +</pre> +</dd> +</dl> + +<a href="OCamlLangImpl7.html">Next: Extending the language: mutable variables / +SSA construction</a> +</div> + +<!-- *********************************************************************** --> +<hr> +<address> + <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img + src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss" alt="Valid CSS!"></a> + <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img + src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401" alt="Valid HTML 4.01!"></a> + + <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a><br> + <a href="mailto:idadesub@users.sourceforge.net">Erick Tryzelaar</a><br> + <a href="http://llvm.org">The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br> + Last modified: $Date: 2007-10-17 11:05:13 -0700 (Wed, 17 Oct 2007) $ +</address> +</body> +</html> |