MFC r309124:

Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to 3.9.0
release, and add lld 3.9.0.  Also completely revamp the build system for
clang, llvm, lldb and their related tools.

Please note that from 3.5.0 onwards, clang, llvm and lldb require C++11
support to build; see UPDATING for more information.

Release notes for llvm, clang and lld are available here:
<http://llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://llvm.org/releases/3.9.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>

Thanks to Ed Maste, Bryan Drewery, Andrew Turner, Antoine Brodin and Jan
Beich for their help.

Relnotes:	yes

MFC r309147:

Pull in r282174 from upstream llvm trunk (by Krzysztof Parzyszek):

  [PPC] Set SP after loading data from stack frame, if no red zone is
  present

  Follow-up to r280705: Make sure that the SP is only restored after
  all data is loaded from the stack frame, if there is no red zone.

  This completes the fix for
  https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26519.

  Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24466

Reported by:    Mark Millard
PR:             214433

MFC r309149:

Pull in r283060 from upstream llvm trunk (by Hal Finkel):

  [PowerPC] Refactor soft-float support, and enable PPC64 soft float

  This change enables soft-float for PowerPC64, and also makes
  soft-float disable all vector instruction sets for both 32-bit and
  64-bit modes. This latter part is necessary because the PPC backend
  canonicalizes many Altivec vector types to floating-point types, and
  so soft-float breaks scalarization support for many operations. Both
  for embedded targets and for operating-system kernels desiring
  soft-float support, it seems reasonable that disabling hardware
  floating-point also disables vector instructions (embedded targets
  without hardware floating point support are unlikely to have Altivec,
  etc. and operating system kernels desiring not to use floating-point
  registers to lower syscall cost are unlikely to want to use vector
  registers either). If someone needs this to work, we'll need to
  change the fact that we promote many Altivec operations to act on
  v4f32. To make it possible to disable Altivec when soft-float is
  enabled, hardware floating-point support needs to be expressed as a
  positive feature, like the others, and not a negative feature,
  because target features cannot have dependencies on the disabling of
  some other feature. So +soft-float has now become -hard-float.

  Fixes PR26970.

Pull in r283061 from upstream clang trunk (by Hal Finkel):

  [PowerPC] Enable soft-float for PPC64, and +soft-float -> -hard-float

  Enable soft-float support on PPC64, as the backend now supports it.
  Also, the backend now uses -hard-float instead of +soft-float, so set
  the target features accordingly.

  Fixes PR26970.

Reported by:	Mark Millard
PR:		214433

MFC r309212:

Add a few missed clang 3.9.0 files to OptionalObsoleteFiles.

MFC r309262:

Fix packaging for clang, lldb and lld 3.9.0

During the upgrade of clang/llvm etc to 3.9.0 in r309124, the PACKAGE
directive in the usr.bin/clang/*.mk files got dropped accidentally.

Restore it, with a few minor changes and additions:
* Correct license in clang.ucl to NCSA
* Add PACKAGE=clang for clang and most of the "ll" tools
* Put lldb in its own package
* Put lld in its own package

Reviewed by:	gjb, jmallett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8666

MFC r309656:

During the bootstrap phase, when building the minimal llvm library on
PowerPC, add lib/Support/Atomic.cpp.  This is needed because upstream
llvm revision r271821 disabled the use of std::call_once, which causes
some fallback functions from Atomic.cpp to be used instead.

Reported by:	Mark Millard
PR:		214902

MFC r309835:

Tentatively apply https://reviews.llvm.org/D18730 to work around gcc PR
70528 (bogus error: constructor required before non-static data member).
This should fix buildworld with the external gcc package.

Reported by:	https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc/

MFC r310194:

Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
3.9.1 release.

Please note that from 3.5.0 onwards, clang, llvm and lldb require C++11
support to build; see UPDATING for more information.

Release notes for llvm, clang and lld will be available here:
<http://releases.llvm.org/3.9.1/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/3.9.1/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/3.9.1/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>

Relnotes:	yes

1 files changed, 110 insertions, 110 deletions

diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/BitTracker.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/BitTracker.cpp
index ea96eb0..d052a83 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/BitTracker.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/Hexagon/BitTracker.cpp
@@ -84,87 +84,89 @@ namespace {
   }
 }
 
-raw_ostream &llvm::operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const BT::BitValue &BV) {
-  switch (BV.Type) {
-    case BT::BitValue::Top:
-      OS << 'T';
-      break;
-    case BT::BitValue::Zero:
-      OS << '0';
-      break;
-    case BT::BitValue::One:
-      OS << '1';
-      break;
-    case BT::BitValue::Ref:
-      OS << printv(BV.RefI.Reg) << '[' << BV.RefI.Pos << ']';
-      break;
+namespace llvm {
+  raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const BT::BitValue &BV) {
+    switch (BV.Type) {
+      case BT::BitValue::Top:
+        OS << 'T';
+        break;
+      case BT::BitValue::Zero:
+        OS << '0';
+        break;
+      case BT::BitValue::One:
+        OS << '1';
+        break;
+      case BT::BitValue::Ref:
+        OS << printv(BV.RefI.Reg) << '[' << BV.RefI.Pos << ']';
+        break;
+    }
+    return OS;
   }
-  return OS;
-}
 
-raw_ostream &llvm::operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const BT::RegisterCell &RC) {
-  unsigned n = RC.Bits.size();
-  OS << "{ w:" << n;
-  // Instead of printing each bit value individually, try to group them
-  // into logical segments, such as sequences of 0 or 1 bits or references
-  // to consecutive bits (e.g. "bits 3-5 are same as bits 7-9 of reg xyz").
-  // "Start" will be the index of the beginning of the most recent segment.
-  unsigned Start = 0;
-  bool SeqRef = false;    // A sequence of refs to consecutive bits.
-  bool ConstRef = false;  // A sequence of refs to the same bit.
-
-  for (unsigned i = 1, n = RC.Bits.size(); i < n; ++i) {
-    const BT::BitValue &V = RC[i];
-    const BT::BitValue &SV = RC[Start];
-    bool IsRef = (V.Type == BT::BitValue::Ref);
-    // If the current value is the same as Start, skip to the next one.
-    if (!IsRef && V == SV)
-      continue;
-    if (IsRef && SV.Type == BT::BitValue::Ref && V.RefI.Reg == SV.RefI.Reg) {
-      if (Start+1 == i) {
-        SeqRef = (V.RefI.Pos == SV.RefI.Pos+1);
-        ConstRef = (V.RefI.Pos == SV.RefI.Pos);
-      }
-      if (SeqRef && V.RefI.Pos == SV.RefI.Pos+(i-Start))
-        continue;
-      if (ConstRef && V.RefI.Pos == SV.RefI.Pos)
+  raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const BT::RegisterCell &RC) {
+    unsigned n = RC.Bits.size();
+    OS << "{ w:" << n;
+    // Instead of printing each bit value individually, try to group them
+    // into logical segments, such as sequences of 0 or 1 bits or references
+    // to consecutive bits (e.g. "bits 3-5 are same as bits 7-9 of reg xyz").
+    // "Start" will be the index of the beginning of the most recent segment.
+    unsigned Start = 0;
+    bool SeqRef = false;    // A sequence of refs to consecutive bits.
+    bool ConstRef = false;  // A sequence of refs to the same bit.
+
+    for (unsigned i = 1, n = RC.Bits.size(); i < n; ++i) {
+      const BT::BitValue &V = RC[i];
+      const BT::BitValue &SV = RC[Start];
+      bool IsRef = (V.Type == BT::BitValue::Ref);
+      // If the current value is the same as Start, skip to the next one.
+      if (!IsRef && V == SV)
         continue;
+      if (IsRef && SV.Type == BT::BitValue::Ref && V.RefI.Reg == SV.RefI.Reg) {
+        if (Start+1 == i) {
+          SeqRef = (V.RefI.Pos == SV.RefI.Pos+1);
+          ConstRef = (V.RefI.Pos == SV.RefI.Pos);
+        }
+        if (SeqRef && V.RefI.Pos == SV.RefI.Pos+(i-Start))
+          continue;
+        if (ConstRef && V.RefI.Pos == SV.RefI.Pos)
+          continue;
+      }
+
+      // The current value is different. Print the previous one and reset
+      // the Start.
+      OS << " [" << Start;
+      unsigned Count = i - Start;
+      if (Count == 1) {
+        OS << "]:" << SV;
+      } else {
+        OS << '-' << i-1 << "]:";
+        if (SV.Type == BT::BitValue::Ref && SeqRef)
+          OS << printv(SV.RefI.Reg) << '[' << SV.RefI.Pos << '-'
+             << SV.RefI.Pos+(Count-1) << ']';
+        else
+          OS << SV;
+      }
+      Start = i;
+      SeqRef = ConstRef = false;
     }
 
-    // The current value is different. Print the previous one and reset
-    // the Start.
     OS << " [" << Start;
-    unsigned Count = i - Start;
-    if (Count == 1) {
-      OS << "]:" << SV;
+    unsigned Count = n - Start;
+    if (n-Start == 1) {
+      OS << "]:" << RC[Start];
     } else {
-      OS << '-' << i-1 << "]:";
+      OS << '-' << n-1 << "]:";
+      const BT::BitValue &SV = RC[Start];
       if (SV.Type == BT::BitValue::Ref && SeqRef)
         OS << printv(SV.RefI.Reg) << '[' << SV.RefI.Pos << '-'
            << SV.RefI.Pos+(Count-1) << ']';
       else
         OS << SV;
     }
-    Start = i;
-    SeqRef = ConstRef = false;
-  }
+    OS << " }";
 
-  OS << " [" << Start;
-  unsigned Count = n - Start;
-  if (n-Start == 1) {
-    OS << "]:" << RC[Start];
-  } else {
-    OS << '-' << n-1 << "]:";
-    const BT::BitValue &SV = RC[Start];
-    if (SV.Type == BT::BitValue::Ref && SeqRef)
-      OS << printv(SV.RefI.Reg) << '[' << SV.RefI.Pos << '-'
-         << SV.RefI.Pos+(Count-1) << ']';
-    else
-      OS << SV;
+    return OS;
   }
-  OS << " }";
-
-  return OS;
 }
 
 BitTracker::BitTracker(const MachineEvaluator &E, MachineFunction &F)
@@ -420,7 +422,7 @@ BT::RegisterCell BT::MachineEvaluator::eIMM(int64_t V, uint16_t W) const {
 
 
 BT::RegisterCell BT::MachineEvaluator::eIMM(const ConstantInt *CI) const {
-  APInt A = CI->getValue();
+  const APInt &A = CI->getValue();
   uint16_t BW = A.getBitWidth();
   assert((unsigned)BW == A.getBitWidth() && "BitWidth overflow");
   RegisterCell Res(BW);
@@ -731,18 +733,18 @@ BT::BitMask BT::MachineEvaluator::mask(unsigned Reg, unsigned Sub) const {
   return BitMask(0, W-1);
 }
 
-
-bool BT::MachineEvaluator::evaluate(const MachineInstr *MI,
-      const CellMapType &Inputs, CellMapType &Outputs) const {
-  unsigned Opc = MI->getOpcode();
+bool BT::MachineEvaluator::evaluate(const MachineInstr &MI,
+                                    const CellMapType &Inputs,
+                                    CellMapType &Outputs) const {
+  unsigned Opc = MI.getOpcode();
   switch (Opc) {
     case TargetOpcode::REG_SEQUENCE: {
-      RegisterRef RD = MI->getOperand(0);
+      RegisterRef RD = MI.getOperand(0);
       assert(RD.Sub == 0);
-      RegisterRef RS = MI->getOperand(1);
-      unsigned SS = MI->getOperand(2).getImm();
-      RegisterRef RT = MI->getOperand(3);
-      unsigned ST = MI->getOperand(4).getImm();
+      RegisterRef RS = MI.getOperand(1);
+      unsigned SS = MI.getOperand(2).getImm();
+      RegisterRef RT = MI.getOperand(3);
+      unsigned ST = MI.getOperand(4).getImm();
       assert(SS != ST);
 
       uint16_t W = getRegBitWidth(RD);
@@ -756,8 +758,8 @@ bool BT::MachineEvaluator::evaluate(const MachineInstr *MI,
     case TargetOpcode::COPY: {
       // COPY can transfer a smaller register into a wider one.
       // If that is the case, fill the remaining high bits with 0.
-      RegisterRef RD = MI->getOperand(0);
-      RegisterRef RS = MI->getOperand(1);
+      RegisterRef RD = MI.getOperand(0);
+      RegisterRef RS = MI.getOperand(1);
       assert(RD.Sub == 0);
       uint16_t WD = getRegBitWidth(RD);
       uint16_t WS = getRegBitWidth(RS);
@@ -780,12 +782,12 @@ bool BT::MachineEvaluator::evaluate(const MachineInstr *MI,
 
 // Main W-Z implementation.
 
-void BT::visitPHI(const MachineInstr *PI) {
-  int ThisN = PI->getParent()->getNumber();
+void BT::visitPHI(const MachineInstr &PI) {
+  int ThisN = PI.getParent()->getNumber();
   if (Trace)
-    dbgs() << "Visit FI(BB#" << ThisN << "): " << *PI;
+    dbgs() << "Visit FI(BB#" << ThisN << "): " << PI;
 
-  const MachineOperand &MD = PI->getOperand(0);
+  const MachineOperand &MD = PI.getOperand(0);
   assert(MD.getSubReg() == 0 && "Unexpected sub-register in definition");
   RegisterRef DefRR(MD);
   uint16_t DefBW = ME.getRegBitWidth(DefRR);
@@ -796,8 +798,8 @@ void BT::visitPHI(const MachineInstr *PI) {
 
   bool Changed = false;
 
-  for (unsigned i = 1, n = PI->getNumOperands(); i < n; i += 2) {
-    const MachineBasicBlock *PB = PI->getOperand(i+1).getMBB();
+  for (unsigned i = 1, n = PI.getNumOperands(); i < n; i += 2) {
+    const MachineBasicBlock *PB = PI.getOperand(i + 1).getMBB();
     int PredN = PB->getNumber();
     if (Trace)
       dbgs() << "  edge BB#" << PredN << "->BB#" << ThisN;
@@ -807,7 +809,7 @@ void BT::visitPHI(const MachineInstr *PI) {
       continue;
     }
 
-    RegisterRef RU = PI->getOperand(i);
+    RegisterRef RU = PI.getOperand(i);
     RegisterCell ResC = ME.getCell(RU, Map);
     if (Trace)
       dbgs() << " input reg: " << PrintReg(RU.Reg, &ME.TRI, RU.Sub)
@@ -824,22 +826,21 @@ void BT::visitPHI(const MachineInstr *PI) {
   }
 }
 
-
-void BT::visitNonBranch(const MachineInstr *MI) {
+void BT::visitNonBranch(const MachineInstr &MI) {
   if (Trace) {
-    int ThisN = MI->getParent()->getNumber();
-    dbgs() << "Visit MI(BB#" << ThisN << "): " << *MI;
+    int ThisN = MI.getParent()->getNumber();
+    dbgs() << "Visit MI(BB#" << ThisN << "): " << MI;
   }
-  if (MI->isDebugValue())
+  if (MI.isDebugValue())
     return;
-  assert(!MI->isBranch() && "Unexpected branch instruction");
+  assert(!MI.isBranch() && "Unexpected branch instruction");
 
   CellMapType ResMap;
   bool Eval = ME.evaluate(MI, Map, ResMap);
 
   if (Trace && Eval) {
-    for (unsigned i = 0, n = MI->getNumOperands(); i < n; ++i) {
-      const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);
+    for (unsigned i = 0, n = MI.getNumOperands(); i < n; ++i) {
+      const MachineOperand &MO = MI.getOperand(i);
       if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.isUse())
         continue;
       RegisterRef RU(MO);
@@ -857,8 +858,8 @@ void BT::visitNonBranch(const MachineInstr *MI) {
 
   // Iterate over all definitions of the instruction, and update the
   // cells accordingly.
-  for (unsigned i = 0, n = MI->getNumOperands(); i < n; ++i) {
-    const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);
+  for (unsigned i = 0, n = MI.getNumOperands(); i < n; ++i) {
+    const MachineOperand &MO = MI.getOperand(i);
     // Visit register defs only.
     if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.isDef())
       continue;
@@ -905,9 +906,8 @@ void BT::visitNonBranch(const MachineInstr *MI) {
   }
 }
 
-
-void BT::visitBranchesFrom(const MachineInstr *BI) {
-  const MachineBasicBlock &B = *BI->getParent();
+void BT::visitBranchesFrom(const MachineInstr &BI) {
+  const MachineBasicBlock &B = *BI.getParent();
   MachineBasicBlock::const_iterator It = BI, End = B.end();
   BranchTargetList Targets, BTs;
   bool FallsThrough = true, DefaultToAll = false;
@@ -915,11 +915,11 @@ void BT::visitBranchesFrom(const MachineInstr *BI) {
 
   do {
     BTs.clear();
-    const MachineInstr *MI = &*It;
+    const MachineInstr &MI = *It;
     if (Trace)
-      dbgs() << "Visit BR(BB#" << ThisN << "): " << *MI;
-    assert(MI->isBranch() && "Expecting branch instruction");
-    InstrExec.insert(MI);
+      dbgs() << "Visit BR(BB#" << ThisN << "): " << MI;
+    assert(MI.isBranch() && "Expecting branch instruction");
+    InstrExec.insert(&MI);
     bool Eval = ME.evaluate(MI, Map, BTs, FallsThrough);
     if (!Eval) {
       // If the evaluation failed, we will add all targets. Keep going in
@@ -983,11 +983,11 @@ void BT::visitUsesOf(unsigned Reg) {
     if (!InstrExec.count(UseI))
       continue;
     if (UseI->isPHI())
-      visitPHI(UseI);
+      visitPHI(*UseI);
     else if (!UseI->isBranch())
-      visitNonBranch(UseI);
+      visitNonBranch(*UseI);
     else
-      visitBranchesFrom(UseI);
+      visitBranchesFrom(*UseI);
   }
 }
 
@@ -1084,8 +1084,8 @@ void BT::run() {
     MachineBasicBlock::const_iterator It = B.begin(), End = B.end();
     // Visit PHI nodes first.
     while (It != End && It->isPHI()) {
-      const MachineInstr *PI = &*It++;
-      InstrExec.insert(PI);
+      const MachineInstr &PI = *It++;
+      InstrExec.insert(&PI);
       visitPHI(PI);
     }
 
@@ -1098,8 +1098,8 @@ void BT::run() {
 
     // Visit non-branch instructions.
     while (It != End && !It->isBranch()) {
-      const MachineInstr *MI = &*It++;
-      InstrExec.insert(MI);
+      const MachineInstr &MI = *It++;
+      InstrExec.insert(&MI);
       visitNonBranch(MI);
     }
     // If block end has been reached, add the fall-through edge to the queue.
@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ void BT::run() {
     } else {
       // Handle the remaining sequence of branches. This function will update
       // the work queue.
-      visitBranchesFrom(It);
+      visitBranchesFrom(*It);
     }
   } // while (!FlowQ->empty())