Update clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to 4.0.0 release:

MFC r309142 (by emaste):

Add WITH_LLD_AS_LD build knob

If set it installs LLD as /usr/bin/ld.  LLD (as of version 3.9) is not
capable of linking the world and kernel, but can self-host and link many
substantial applications. GNU ld continues to be used for the world and
kernel build, regardless of how this knob is set.

It is on by default for arm64, and off for all other CPU architectures.

Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation

MFC r310840:

Reapply 310775, now it also builds correctly if lldb is disabled:

Move llvm-objdump from CLANG_EXTRAS to installed by default

We currently install three tools from binutils 2.17.50: as, ld, and
objdump. Work is underway to migrate to a permissively-licensed
tool-chain, with one goal being the retirement of binutils 2.17.50.

LLVM's llvm-objdump is intended to be compatible with GNU objdump
although it is currently missing some options and may have formatting
differences. Enable it by default for testing and further investigation.
It may later be changed to install as /usr/bin/objdump, it becomes a
fully viable replacement.

Reviewed by:	emaste
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8879

MFC r312855 (by emaste):

Rename LLD_AS_LD to LLD_IS_LD, for consistency with CLANG_IS_CC

Reported by:	Dan McGregor <dan.mcgregor usask.ca>

MFC r313559 | glebius | 2017-02-10 18:34:48 +0100 (Fri, 10 Feb 2017) | 5 lines

Don't check struct rtentry on FreeBSD, it is an internal kernel structure.
On other systems it may be API structure for SIOCADDRT/SIOCDELRT.

Reviewed by:	emaste, dim

MFC r314152 (by jkim):

Remove an assembler flag, which is redundant since r309124.  The upstream
took care of it by introducing a macro NO_EXEC_STACK_DIRECTIVE.

http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=273500&view=rev

Reviewed by:	dim

MFC r314564:

Upgrade our copies of clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to
4.0.0 (branches/release_40 296509).  The release will follow soon.

Please note that from 3.5.0 onwards, clang, llvm and lldb require C++11
support to build; see UPDATING for more information.

Also note that as of 4.0.0, lld should be able to link the base system
on amd64 and aarch64.  See the WITH_LLD_IS_LLD setting in src.conf(5).
Though please be aware that this is work in progress.

Release notes for llvm, clang and lld will be available here:
<http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>
<http://releases.llvm.org/4.0.0/tools/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.html>

Thanks to Ed Maste, Jan Beich, Antoine Brodin and Eric Fiselier for
their help.

Relnotes:	yes
Exp-run:	antoine
PR:		215969, 216008

MFC r314708:

For now, revert r287232 from upstream llvm trunk (by Daniil Fukalov):

  [SCEV] limit recursion depth of CompareSCEVComplexity

  Summary:
  CompareSCEVComplexity goes too deep (50+ on a quite a big unrolled
  loop) and runs almost infinite time.

  Added cache of "equal" SCEV pairs to earlier cutoff of further
  estimation. Recursion depth limit was also introduced as a parameter.

  Reviewers: sanjoy

  Subscribers: mzolotukhin, tstellarAMD, llvm-commits

  Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26389

This commit is the cause of excessive compile times on skein_block.c
(and possibly other files) during kernel builds on amd64.

We never saw the problematic behavior described in this upstream commit,
so for now it is better to revert it.  An upstream bug has been filed
here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32142

Reported by:	mjg

MFC r314795:

Reapply r287232 from upstream llvm trunk (by Daniil Fukalov):

  [SCEV] limit recursion depth of CompareSCEVComplexity

  Summary:
  CompareSCEVComplexity goes too deep (50+ on a quite a big unrolled
  loop) and runs almost infinite time.

  Added cache of "equal" SCEV pairs to earlier cutoff of further
  estimation. Recursion depth limit was also introduced as a parameter.

  Reviewers: sanjoy

  Subscribers: mzolotukhin, tstellarAMD, llvm-commits

  Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26389

Pull in r296992 from upstream llvm trunk (by Sanjoy Das):

  [SCEV] Decrease the recursion threshold for CompareValueComplexity

  Fixes PR32142.

  r287232 accidentally increased the recursion threshold for
  CompareValueComplexity from 2 to 32.  This change reverses that
  change by introducing a separate flag for CompareValueComplexity's
  threshold.

The latter revision fixes the excessive compile times for skein_block.c.

MFC r314907 | mmel | 2017-03-08 12:40:27 +0100 (Wed, 08 Mar 2017) | 7 lines

Unbreak ARMv6 world.

The new compiler_rt library imported with clang 4.0.0 have several fatal
issues (non-functional __udivsi3 for example) with ARM specific instrict
functions. As temporary workaround, until upstream solve these problems,
disable all thumb[1][2] related feature.

MFC r315016:

Update clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ to 4.0.0 release.
We were already very close to the last release candidate, so this is a
pretty minor update.

Relnotes:	yes

MFC r316005:

Revert r314907, and pull in r298713 from upstream compiler-rt trunk (by
Weiming Zhao):

  builtins: Select correct code fragments when compiling for Thumb1/Thum2/ARM ISA.

  Summary:
  Value of __ARM_ARCH_ISA_THUMB isn't based on the actual compilation
  mode (-mthumb, -marm), it reflect's capability of given CPU.

  Due to this:
   - use  __tbumb__ and __thumb2__ insteand of __ARM_ARCH_ISA_THUMB
   - use '.thumb' directive consistently  in all affected files
   - decorate all thumb functions using
     DEFINE_COMPILERRT_THUMB_FUNCTION()

  ---------
  Note: This patch doesn't fix broken Thumb1 variant of __udivsi3 !

  Reviewers: weimingz, rengolin, compnerd

  Subscribers: aemerson, dim

  Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30938

Discussed with:	mmel

1 files changed, 213 insertions, 63 deletions

diff --git a/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SplitKit.cpp b/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SplitKit.cpp
index 07be24b..1c6a84e 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SplitKit.cpp
+++ b/contrib/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SplitKit.cpp
@@ -381,9 +381,59 @@ LLVM_DUMP_METHOD void SplitEditor::dump() const {
 }
 #endif
 
+LiveInterval::SubRange &SplitEditor::getSubRangeForMask(LaneBitmask LM,
+                                                        LiveInterval &LI) {
+  for (LiveInterval::SubRange &S : LI.subranges())
+    if (S.LaneMask == LM)
+      return S;
+  llvm_unreachable("SubRange for this mask not found");
+}
+
+void SplitEditor::addDeadDef(LiveInterval &LI, VNInfo *VNI, bool Original) {
+  if (!LI.hasSubRanges()) {
+    LI.createDeadDef(VNI);
+    return;
+  }
+
+  SlotIndex Def = VNI->def;
+  if (Original) {
+    // If we are transferring a def from the original interval, make sure
+    // to only update the subranges for which the original subranges had
+    // a def at this location.
+    for (LiveInterval::SubRange &S : LI.subranges()) {
+      auto &PS = getSubRangeForMask(S.LaneMask, Edit->getParent());
+      VNInfo *PV = PS.getVNInfoAt(Def);
+      if (PV != nullptr && PV->def == Def)
+        S.createDeadDef(Def, LIS.getVNInfoAllocator());
+    }
+  } else {
+    // This is a new def: either from rematerialization, or from an inserted
+    // copy. Since rematerialization can regenerate a definition of a sub-
+    // register, we need to check which subranges need to be updated.
+    const MachineInstr *DefMI = LIS.getInstructionFromIndex(Def);
+    assert(DefMI != nullptr);
+    LaneBitmask LM;
+    for (const MachineOperand &DefOp : DefMI->defs()) {
+      unsigned R = DefOp.getReg();
+      if (R != LI.reg)
+        continue;
+      if (unsigned SR = DefOp.getSubReg())
+        LM |= TRI.getSubRegIndexLaneMask(SR);
+      else {
+        LM = MRI.getMaxLaneMaskForVReg(R);
+        break;
+      }
+    }
+    for (LiveInterval::SubRange &S : LI.subranges())
+      if ((S.LaneMask & LM).any())
+        S.createDeadDef(Def, LIS.getVNInfoAllocator());
+  }
+}
+
 VNInfo *SplitEditor::defValue(unsigned RegIdx,
                               const VNInfo *ParentVNI,
-                              SlotIndex Idx) {
+                              SlotIndex Idx,
+                              bool Original) {
   assert(ParentVNI && "Mapping  NULL value");
   assert(Idx.isValid() && "Invalid SlotIndex");
   assert(Edit->getParent().getVNInfoAt(Idx) == ParentVNI && "Bad Parent VNI");
@@ -392,28 +442,28 @@ VNInfo *SplitEditor::defValue(unsigned RegIdx,
   // Create a new value.
   VNInfo *VNI = LI->getNextValue(Idx, LIS.getVNInfoAllocator());
 
+  bool Force = LI->hasSubRanges();
+  ValueForcePair FP(Force ? nullptr : VNI, Force);
   // Use insert for lookup, so we can add missing values with a second lookup.
   std::pair<ValueMap::iterator, bool> InsP =
-    Values.insert(std::make_pair(std::make_pair(RegIdx, ParentVNI->id),
-                                 ValueForcePair(VNI, false)));
+    Values.insert(std::make_pair(std::make_pair(RegIdx, ParentVNI->id), FP));
 
-  // This was the first time (RegIdx, ParentVNI) was mapped.
-  // Keep it as a simple def without any liveness.
-  if (InsP.second)
+  // This was the first time (RegIdx, ParentVNI) was mapped, and it is not
+  // forced. Keep it as a simple def without any liveness.
+  if (!Force && InsP.second)
     return VNI;
 
   // If the previous value was a simple mapping, add liveness for it now.
   if (VNInfo *OldVNI = InsP.first->second.getPointer()) {
-    SlotIndex Def = OldVNI->def;
-    LI->addSegment(LiveInterval::Segment(Def, Def.getDeadSlot(), OldVNI));
-    // No longer a simple mapping.  Switch to a complex, non-forced mapping.
-    InsP.first->second = ValueForcePair();
+    addDeadDef(*LI, OldVNI, Original);
+
+    // No longer a simple mapping.  Switch to a complex mapping. If the
+    // interval has subranges, make it a forced mapping.
+    InsP.first->second = ValueForcePair(nullptr, Force);
   }
 
   // This is a complex mapping, add liveness for VNI
-  SlotIndex Def = VNI->def;
-  LI->addSegment(LiveInterval::Segment(Def, Def.getDeadSlot(), VNI));
-
+  addDeadDef(*LI, VNI, Original);
   return VNI;
 }
 
@@ -431,9 +481,8 @@ void SplitEditor::forceRecompute(unsigned RegIdx, const VNInfo *ParentVNI) {
 
   // This was previously a single mapping. Make sure the old def is represented
   // by a trivial live range.
-  SlotIndex Def = VNI->def;
-  LiveInterval *LI = &LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(RegIdx));
-  LI->addSegment(LiveInterval::Segment(Def, Def.getDeadSlot(), VNI));
+  addDeadDef(LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(RegIdx)), VNI, false);
+
   // Mark as complex mapped, forced.
   VFP = ValueForcePair(nullptr, true);
 }
@@ -455,13 +504,18 @@ VNInfo *SplitEditor::defFromParent(unsigned RegIdx,
   unsigned Original = VRM.getOriginal(Edit->get(RegIdx));
   LiveInterval &OrigLI = LIS.getInterval(Original);
   VNInfo *OrigVNI = OrigLI.getVNInfoAt(UseIdx);
-  LiveRangeEdit::Remat RM(ParentVNI);
-  RM.OrigMI = LIS.getInstructionFromIndex(OrigVNI->def);
 
-  if (Edit->canRematerializeAt(RM, OrigVNI, UseIdx, true)) {
-    Def = Edit->rematerializeAt(MBB, I, LI->reg, RM, TRI, Late);
-    ++NumRemats;
-  } else {
+  bool DidRemat = false;
+  if (OrigVNI) {
+    LiveRangeEdit::Remat RM(ParentVNI);
+    RM.OrigMI = LIS.getInstructionFromIndex(OrigVNI->def);
+    if (Edit->canRematerializeAt(RM, OrigVNI, UseIdx, true)) {
+      Def = Edit->rematerializeAt(MBB, I, LI->reg, RM, TRI, Late);
+      ++NumRemats;
+      DidRemat = true;
+    }
+  }
+  if (!DidRemat) {
     // Can't remat, just insert a copy from parent.
     CopyMI = BuildMI(MBB, I, DebugLoc(), TII.get(TargetOpcode::COPY), LI->reg)
                .addReg(Edit->getReg());
@@ -472,7 +526,7 @@ VNInfo *SplitEditor::defFromParent(unsigned RegIdx,
   }
 
   // Define the value in Reg.
-  return defValue(RegIdx, ParentVNI, Def);
+  return defValue(RegIdx, ParentVNI, Def, false);
 }
 
 /// Create a new virtual register and live interval.
@@ -621,7 +675,7 @@ SlotIndex SplitEditor::leaveIntvAtTop(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
   }
 
   VNInfo *VNI = defFromParent(0, ParentVNI, Start, MBB,
-                              MBB.SkipPHIsAndLabels(MBB.begin()));
+                              MBB.SkipPHIsLabelsAndDebug(MBB.begin()));
   RegAssign.insert(Start, VNI->def, OpenIdx);
   DEBUG(dump());
   return VNI->def;
@@ -944,14 +998,15 @@ bool SplitEditor::transferValues() {
       }
 
       // The interval [Start;End) is continuously mapped to RegIdx, ParentVNI.
-      DEBUG(dbgs() << " [" << Start << ';' << End << ")=" << RegIdx);
-      LiveRange &LR = LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(RegIdx));
+      DEBUG(dbgs() << " [" << Start << ';' << End << ")=" << RegIdx
+                   << '(' << PrintReg(Edit->get(RegIdx)) << ')');
+      LiveInterval &LI = LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(RegIdx));
 
       // Check for a simply defined value that can be blitted directly.
       ValueForcePair VFP = Values.lookup(std::make_pair(RegIdx, ParentVNI->id));
       if (VNInfo *VNI = VFP.getPointer()) {
         DEBUG(dbgs() << ':' << VNI->id);
-        LR.addSegment(LiveInterval::Segment(Start, End, VNI));
+        LI.addSegment(LiveInterval::Segment(Start, End, VNI));
         Start = End;
         continue;
       }
@@ -975,7 +1030,7 @@ bool SplitEditor::transferValues() {
 
       // The first block may be live-in, or it may have its own def.
       if (Start != BlockStart) {
-        VNInfo *VNI = LR.extendInBlock(BlockStart, std::min(BlockEnd, End));
+        VNInfo *VNI = LI.extendInBlock(BlockStart, std::min(BlockEnd, End));
         assert(VNI && "Missing def for complex mapped value");
         DEBUG(dbgs() << ':' << VNI->id << "*BB#" << MBB->getNumber());
         // MBB has its own def. Is it also live-out?
@@ -995,7 +1050,7 @@ bool SplitEditor::transferValues() {
         if (BlockStart == ParentVNI->def) {
           // This block has the def of a parent PHI, so it isn't live-in.
           assert(ParentVNI->isPHIDef() && "Non-phi defined at block start?");
-          VNInfo *VNI = LR.extendInBlock(BlockStart, std::min(BlockEnd, End));
+          VNInfo *VNI = LI.extendInBlock(BlockStart, std::min(BlockEnd, End));
           assert(VNI && "Missing def for complex mapped parent PHI");
           if (End >= BlockEnd)
             LRC.setLiveOutValue(&*MBB, VNI); // Live-out as well.
@@ -1003,10 +1058,10 @@ bool SplitEditor::transferValues() {
           // This block needs a live-in value.  The last block covered may not
           // be live-out.
           if (End < BlockEnd)
-            LRC.addLiveInBlock(LR, MDT[&*MBB], End);
+            LRC.addLiveInBlock(LI, MDT[&*MBB], End);
           else {
             // Live-through, and we don't know the value.
-            LRC.addLiveInBlock(LR, MDT[&*MBB]);
+            LRC.addLiveInBlock(LI, MDT[&*MBB]);
             LRC.setLiveOutValue(&*MBB, nullptr);
           }
         }
@@ -1025,42 +1080,90 @@ bool SplitEditor::transferValues() {
   return Skipped;
 }
 
+static bool removeDeadSegment(SlotIndex Def, LiveRange &LR) {
+  const LiveRange::Segment *Seg = LR.getSegmentContaining(Def);
+  if (Seg == nullptr)
+    return true;
+  if (Seg->end != Def.getDeadSlot())
+    return false;
+  // This is a dead PHI. Remove it.
+  LR.removeSegment(*Seg, true);
+  return true;
+}
+
+void SplitEditor::extendPHIRange(MachineBasicBlock &B, LiveRangeCalc &LRC,
+                                 LiveRange &LR, LaneBitmask LM,
+                                 ArrayRef<SlotIndex> Undefs) {
+  for (MachineBasicBlock *P : B.predecessors()) {
+    SlotIndex End = LIS.getMBBEndIdx(P);
+    SlotIndex LastUse = End.getPrevSlot();
+    // The predecessor may not have a live-out value. That is OK, like an
+    // undef PHI operand.
+    LiveInterval &PLI = Edit->getParent();
+    // Need the cast because the inputs to ?: would otherwise be deemed
+    // "incompatible": SubRange vs LiveInterval.
+    LiveRange &PSR = !LM.all() ? getSubRangeForMask(LM, PLI)
+                               : static_cast<LiveRange&>(PLI);
+    if (PSR.liveAt(LastUse))
+      LRC.extend(LR, End, /*PhysReg=*/0, Undefs);
+  }
+}
+
 void SplitEditor::extendPHIKillRanges() {
   // Extend live ranges to be live-out for successor PHI values.
-  for (const VNInfo *PHIVNI : Edit->getParent().valnos) {
-    if (PHIVNI->isUnused() || !PHIVNI->isPHIDef())
-      continue;
-    unsigned RegIdx = RegAssign.lookup(PHIVNI->def);
-    LiveRange &LR = LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(RegIdx));
-
-    // Check whether PHI is dead.
-    const LiveRange::Segment *Segment = LR.getSegmentContaining(PHIVNI->def);
-    assert(Segment != nullptr && "Missing segment for VNI");
-    if (Segment->end == PHIVNI->def.getDeadSlot()) {
-      // This is a dead PHI. Remove it.
-      LR.removeSegment(*Segment, true);
+
+  // Visit each PHI def slot in the parent live interval. If the def is dead,
+  // remove it. Otherwise, extend the live interval to reach the end indexes
+  // of all predecessor blocks.
+
+  LiveInterval &ParentLI = Edit->getParent();
+  for (const VNInfo *V : ParentLI.valnos) {
+    if (V->isUnused() || !V->isPHIDef())
       continue;
-    }
 
+    unsigned RegIdx = RegAssign.lookup(V->def);
+    LiveInterval &LI = LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(RegIdx));
     LiveRangeCalc &LRC = getLRCalc(RegIdx);
-    MachineBasicBlock *MBB = LIS.getMBBFromIndex(PHIVNI->def);
-    for (MachineBasicBlock::pred_iterator PI = MBB->pred_begin(),
-         PE = MBB->pred_end(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
-      SlotIndex End = LIS.getMBBEndIdx(*PI);
-      SlotIndex LastUse = End.getPrevSlot();
-      // The predecessor may not have a live-out value. That is OK, like an
-      // undef PHI operand.
-      if (Edit->getParent().liveAt(LastUse)) {
-        assert(RegAssign.lookup(LastUse) == RegIdx &&
-               "Different register assignment in phi predecessor");
-        LRC.extend(LR, End);
-      }
+    MachineBasicBlock &B = *LIS.getMBBFromIndex(V->def);
+    if (!removeDeadSegment(V->def, LI))
+      extendPHIRange(B, LRC, LI, LaneBitmask::getAll(), /*Undefs=*/{});
+  }
+
+  SmallVector<SlotIndex, 4> Undefs;
+  LiveRangeCalc SubLRC;
+
+  for (LiveInterval::SubRange &PS : ParentLI.subranges()) {
+    for (const VNInfo *V : PS.valnos) {
+      if (V->isUnused() || !V->isPHIDef())
+        continue;
+      unsigned RegIdx = RegAssign.lookup(V->def);
+      LiveInterval &LI = LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(RegIdx));
+      LiveInterval::SubRange &S = getSubRangeForMask(PS.LaneMask, LI);
+      if (removeDeadSegment(V->def, S))
+        continue;
+
+      MachineBasicBlock &B = *LIS.getMBBFromIndex(V->def);
+      SubLRC.reset(&VRM.getMachineFunction(), LIS.getSlotIndexes(), &MDT,
+                   &LIS.getVNInfoAllocator());
+      Undefs.clear();
+      LI.computeSubRangeUndefs(Undefs, PS.LaneMask, MRI, *LIS.getSlotIndexes());
+      extendPHIRange(B, SubLRC, S, PS.LaneMask, Undefs);
     }
   }
 }
 
 /// rewriteAssigned - Rewrite all uses of Edit->getReg().
 void SplitEditor::rewriteAssigned(bool ExtendRanges) {
+  struct ExtPoint {
+    ExtPoint(const MachineOperand &O, unsigned R, SlotIndex N)
+      : MO(O), RegIdx(R), Next(N) {}
+    MachineOperand MO;
+    unsigned RegIdx;
+    SlotIndex Next;
+  };
+
+  SmallVector<ExtPoint,4> ExtPoints;
+
   for (MachineRegisterInfo::reg_iterator RI = MRI.reg_begin(Edit->getReg()),
        RE = MRI.reg_end(); RI != RE;) {
     MachineOperand &MO = *RI;
@@ -1082,8 +1185,8 @@ void SplitEditor::rewriteAssigned(bool ExtendRanges) {
 
     // Rewrite to the mapped register at Idx.
     unsigned RegIdx = RegAssign.lookup(Idx);
-    LiveInterval *LI = &LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(RegIdx));
-    MO.setReg(LI->reg);
+    LiveInterval &LI = LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(RegIdx));
+    MO.setReg(LI.reg);
     DEBUG(dbgs() << "  rewr BB#" << MI->getParent()->getNumber() << '\t'
                  << Idx << ':' << RegIdx << '\t' << *MI);
 
@@ -1095,7 +1198,7 @@ void SplitEditor::rewriteAssigned(bool ExtendRanges) {
     if (MO.isDef()) {
       if (!MO.getSubReg() && !MO.isEarlyClobber())
         continue;
-      // We may wan't to extend a live range for a partial redef, or for a use
+      // We may want to extend a live range for a partial redef, or for a use
       // tied to an early clobber.
       Idx = Idx.getPrevSlot();
       if (!Edit->getParent().liveAt(Idx))
@@ -1103,7 +1206,53 @@ void SplitEditor::rewriteAssigned(bool ExtendRanges) {
     } else
       Idx = Idx.getRegSlot(true);
 
-    getLRCalc(RegIdx).extend(*LI, Idx.getNextSlot());
+    SlotIndex Next = Idx.getNextSlot();
+    if (LI.hasSubRanges()) {
+      // We have to delay extending subranges until we have seen all operands
+      // defining the register. This is because a <def,read-undef> operand
+      // will create an "undef" point, and we cannot extend any subranges
+      // until all of them have been accounted for.
+      if (MO.isUse())
+        ExtPoints.push_back(ExtPoint(MO, RegIdx, Next));
+    } else {
+      LiveRangeCalc &LRC = getLRCalc(RegIdx);
+      LRC.extend(LI, Next, 0, ArrayRef<SlotIndex>());
+    }
+  }
+
+  for (ExtPoint &EP : ExtPoints) {
+    LiveInterval &LI = LIS.getInterval(Edit->get(EP.RegIdx));
+    assert(LI.hasSubRanges());
+
+    LiveRangeCalc SubLRC;
+    unsigned Reg = EP.MO.getReg(), Sub = EP.MO.getSubReg();
+    LaneBitmask LM = Sub != 0 ? TRI.getSubRegIndexLaneMask(Sub)
+                              : MRI.getMaxLaneMaskForVReg(Reg);
+    for (LiveInterval::SubRange &S : LI.subranges()) {
+      if ((S.LaneMask & LM).none())
+        continue;
+      // The problem here can be that the new register may have been created
+      // for a partially defined original register. For example:
+      //   %vreg827:subreg_hireg<def,read-undef> = ...
+      //   ...
+      //   %vreg828<def> = COPY %vreg827
+      if (S.empty())
+        continue;
+      SubLRC.reset(&VRM.getMachineFunction(), LIS.getSlotIndexes(), &MDT,
+                   &LIS.getVNInfoAllocator());
+      SmallVector<SlotIndex, 4> Undefs;
+      LI.computeSubRangeUndefs(Undefs, S.LaneMask, MRI, *LIS.getSlotIndexes());
+      SubLRC.extend(S, EP.Next, 0, Undefs);
+    }
+  }
+
+  for (unsigned R : *Edit) {
+    LiveInterval &LI = LIS.getInterval(R);
+    if (!LI.hasSubRanges())
+      continue;
+    LI.clear();
+    LI.removeEmptySubRanges();
+    LIS.constructMainRangeFromSubranges(LI);
   }
 }
 
@@ -1146,7 +1295,7 @@ void SplitEditor::finish(SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> *LRMap) {
     if (ParentVNI->isUnused())
       continue;
     unsigned RegIdx = RegAssign.lookup(ParentVNI->def);
-    defValue(RegIdx, ParentVNI, ParentVNI->def);
+    defValue(RegIdx, ParentVNI, ParentVNI->def, true);
 
     // Force rematted values to be recomputed everywhere.
     // The new live ranges may be truncated.
@@ -1182,8 +1331,9 @@ void SplitEditor::finish(SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> *LRMap) {
     deleteRematVictims();
 
   // Get rid of unused values and set phi-kill flags.
-  for (LiveRangeEdit::iterator I = Edit->begin(), E = Edit->end(); I != E; ++I) {
-    LiveInterval &LI = LIS.getInterval(*I);
+  for (unsigned Reg : *Edit) {
+    LiveInterval &LI = LIS.getInterval(Reg);
+    LI.removeEmptySubRanges();
     LI.RenumberValues();
   }