diff options
| author | ed <ed@FreeBSD.org> | 2009-05-27 19:28:04 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | ed <ed@FreeBSD.org> | 2009-05-27 19:28:04 +0000 |
| commit | 3779b68747cdae9d6e156307aae1ecb97b52d4ea (patch) | |
| tree | 6d3ce9791e7680277093a1a296bcbea3aaeb6040 /ObsoleteFiles.inc | |
| parent | 9fc2aafa8283c2dc1af8bfbfd1d727b16c0837d2 (diff) | |
| download | FreeBSD-src-3779b68747cdae9d6e156307aae1ecb97b52d4ea.zip FreeBSD-src-3779b68747cdae9d6e156307aae1ecb97b52d4ea.tar.gz | |
Rename the queue macros I introduced last year.
Last year I added SLIST_REMOVE_NEXT and STAILQ_REMOVE_NEXT, to remove
entries behind an element in the list, using O(1) time. I recently
discovered NetBSD also has a similar macro, called SLIST_REMOVE_AFTER.
In my opinion this approach is a lot better:
- It doesn't have the unused first argument of the list pointer. I added
this, mainly because OpenBSD also had it.
- The _AFTER suffix makes a lot more sense, because it is related to
SLIST_INSERT_AFTER. _NEXT is only used to iterate through the list.
The reason why I want to rename this now, is to make sure we don't
release a major version with the badly named macros.
Diffstat (limited to 'ObsoleteFiles.inc')
| -rw-r--r-- | ObsoleteFiles.inc | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ObsoleteFiles.inc b/ObsoleteFiles.inc index dfa8e79..197f4a0 100644 --- a/ObsoleteFiles.inc +++ b/ObsoleteFiles.inc @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ # The file is partitioned: OLD_FILES first, then OLD_LIBS and OLD_DIRS last. # +# 20090527: renaming of S{LIST,TAILQ}_REMOVE_NEXT() to _REMOVE_AFTER() +OLD_FILES+=usr/share/man/man3/SLIST_REMOVE_NEXT.3.gz +OLD_FILES+=usr/share/man/man3/STAILQ_REMOVE_NEXT.3.gz # 20090527: removal of legacy USB stack OLD_FILES+=usr/include/legacy/dev/usb/dsbr100io.h OLD_FILES+=usr/include/legacy/dev/usb/ehcireg.h |
