diff options
| author | imp <imp@FreeBSD.org> | 2003-03-17 13:19:28 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | imp <imp@FreeBSD.org> | 2003-03-17 13:19:28 +0000 |
| commit | cc6a784ca96ec28686595a8e482eeeca31139bb2 (patch) | |
| tree | ea203bdcf699eaf9f72678fc4aba26b189ac3b6e | |
| parent | 90f136c592dc7e5ed9c6ed2c80de267ef1ed74d6 (diff) | |
| download | FreeBSD-src-cc6a784ca96ec28686595a8e482eeeca31139bb2.zip FreeBSD-src-cc6a784ca96ec28686595a8e482eeeca31139bb2.tar.gz | |
Remove bogus KASSERT. The 802.11 layer and the resume from suspend
code both seem to call wi_start (directly or via the if_start pointer)
without checking to see if OACTIVE is 0. In addition, I think that
with the use of 3 transmit buffers this routine can be called with
OACTIVE set, but I might be mistaken about that (and it doesn't
matter).
Reviewed by: sam
Noticed by: imp, alfred, ambrisko
| -rw-r--r-- | sys/dev/wi/if_wi.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/sys/dev/wi/if_wi.c b/sys/dev/wi/if_wi.c index c0fc9b4..7a12be8 100644 --- a/sys/dev/wi/if_wi.c +++ b/sys/dev/wi/if_wi.c @@ -839,8 +839,6 @@ wi_start(struct ifnet *ifp) WI_UNLOCK(sc); return; } - KASSERT((ifp->if_flags & IFF_OACTIVE) == 0, - ("wi_start: if_flags %x\n", ifp->if_flags)); memset(&frmhdr, 0, sizeof(frmhdr)); cur = sc->sc_txnext; |
