Fix a bug in the CPU % limiting code

If you attempt to set a pcpu limit that is higher than
110% using rctl (for instance, you want a jail to be
able to use 2 cores on your system so you set pcpu to
200%) the thing you are trying to limit becomes unthrottled.

PR:	189870
Submitted by:	dustinwenz@ebureau.com
Reviewed by:	trasz
MFC after:	1 week

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/sys/kern/kern_racct.c b/sys/kern/kern_racct.c
index d32b432..dde0baf 100644
--- a/sys/kern/kern_racct.c
+++ b/sys/kern/kern_racct.c
@@ -517,16 +517,16 @@ racct_adjust_resource(struct racct *racct, int resource,
 	
 	/*
 	 * There are some cases where the racct %cpu resource would grow
-	 * beyond 100%.
-	 * For example in racct_proc_exit() we add the process %cpu usage
-	 * to the ucred racct containers.  If too many processes terminated
-	 * in a short time span, the ucred %cpu resource could grow too much.
-	 * Also, the 4BSD scheduler sometimes returns for a thread more than
-	 * 100% cpu usage.  So we set a boundary here to 100%.
+	 * beyond 100% per core.  For example in racct_proc_exit() we add
+	 * the process %cpu usage to the ucred racct containers.  If too
+	 * many processes terminated in a short time span, the ucred %cpu
+	 * resource could grow too much.  Also, the 4BSD scheduler sometimes
+	 * returns for a thread more than 100% cpu usage. So we set a sane
+	 * boundary here to 100% * the maxumum number of CPUs.
 	 */
 	if ((resource == RACCT_PCTCPU) &&
-	    (racct->r_resources[RACCT_PCTCPU] > 100 * 1000000))
-		racct->r_resources[RACCT_PCTCPU] = 100 * 1000000;
+	    (racct->r_resources[RACCT_PCTCPU] > 100 * 1000000 * (int64_t)MAXCPU))
+		racct->r_resources[RACCT_PCTCPU] = 100 * 1000000 * (int64_t)MAXCPU;
 }
 
 static int