| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Prompted by PR: 13476, 13477
Submitted by: KATO Tsuguru
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[Has anyone figured-out what makes the number 393 so interesting to PW, now?]
I wonder what was going through Jordan's head during his infamous
$Id$-smashing commit.
Before I forget....
Thanks to naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) for prompting
this commit. See msg-id: 7geokh$tje$1@mips.rhein-neckar.de
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
don't USE_IMAKE, don't appear to change behaviour on NOMANCOMPRESS (many
do, subtly) and don't install more than one manpage.
Any port listed here is a good candidate for a general review simply
due to age... For example, a number of them seem to patch an install:
target into the program Makefile and/or arbitrarily compress their
manpages from patches/patch-*. This has been out-of-vogue since I would
guess mid-1996, at least.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
1.227.2.41 (2.2-stable) of bsd.port.mk for this to be interpreted
correctly.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
all the COMMENTs! No package names, no version numbers, no "this is
absolutix-3.1.2" type comments that have zero information contents.
Now, without any bad examples to follow, nobody has an excuse to import
a port with those kind of comments. :)
Phew! 238 ports modified!
|
| |
|
|
| |
correctly reference compressed man pages, and define REQUIRES_MOTIF.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
