| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: 20956
Submitted by: Andre Albsmeier <andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Support CC/CFLAGS properly
PR: 16674
Submitted by: KATO Tsuguru <tkato@prontomail.ne.jp>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for quite some time. If any non-committer wants to take over maintainership
please let me know.
Reviewed by: ports
No response from: erich
|
|
|
|
| |
string so I fixed it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
$ time cvs $FREEBSD ci -m `cat msg` `cat ci.ab`
Results to follow. :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Makefile. A do-install: target is preferrable if one does not plan
on submitting patches to the author. Doing it this way has the
nice side-advantages that we now respect MANOWN and BINOWN.
- Respect CFLAGS
- move patches/patch-ab to files/mplex.1
|
|
|
|
| |
what does this thing actually do!? :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
don't USE_IMAKE, don't appear to change behaviour on NOMANCOMPRESS (many
do, subtly) and don't install more than one manpage.
Any port listed here is a good candidate for a general review simply
due to age... For example, a number of them seem to patch an install:
target into the program Makefile and/or arbitrarily compress their
manpages from patches/patch-*. This has been out-of-vogue since I would
guess mid-1996, at least.
|
| |
|
|
|