| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
PR: ports/70661
Submitted by: Alex Kapranoff <kappa@rambler-co.ru>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reading the 20040314 entry in /usr/ports/CHANGES regarding importing
of ports into the tree that require the use of GNU autotools.
Thanks awfully
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Begin autotools sanitization sequence by requiring ports to explicitly
specify which version of {libtool,autoconf,automake} they need, erasing
the concept of a "system default".
For ports-in-waiting:
USE_LIBTOOL=YES -> USE_LIBTOOL_VER=13
USE_AUTOCONF=YES -> USE_AUTOCONF_VER=213
USE_AUTOMAKE=YES -> USE_AUTOMAKE_VER=14
Ports attempting to use the old style system after June 1st 2004 will be
sorely disappointed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the USE_<x> equivalents. In the current scheme of things, the WANT_
variables in this case are synonymous with the USE_ ones, and thus need
to be exterminated.
First in a series of major autotools cleanups.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Noticed by: fenner's distfile survey
|
| |
|
|
system, generic in nature, but intended for use in speeding up dynamic
web applications by alleviating database load.
|