Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | New INDEX for 5.0, with 8332 ports. | kris | 2003-03-16 | 1 | -4504/+4624 |
| | |||||
* | New INDEX for 5.x, with 8212 ports | kris | 2003-02-09 | 1 | -5078/+5407 |
| | |||||
* | Last-minute update to include new isc-dhcp3 in RELEASE_5_0_0 index. | kris | 2003-01-16 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | Patch up INDEX for RELEASE_5_0_0 to include last-minute postgresql and | kris | 2003-01-12 | 1 | -37/+37 |
| | | | | gdm2 changes. | ||||
* | Should auld releases be forgot, | kris | 2003-01-01 | 1 | -3646/+3631 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | And never brought to mind? Should auld releases be forgot, And ports of auld lang syne? And ports of auld lang syne, my dear, And ports of auld lang syne. Should auld releases be forgot, And ports of auld lang syne? This is the INDEX for 5.0-RELEASE (barring last-minute changes), with 7883 ports. 7883 is a prime number! | ||||
* | Add a separate INDEX file for 5.0 systems. This is necessary because | kris | 2002-12-05 | 1 | -0/+7898 |
ports built on 4.x and 5.0 have substantially different dependency lists (mostly due to various system components being moved out of the base system and into the ports tree, such as perl). |